2008
DOI: 10.1097/jpo.0b013e3181875b17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Residual Limb Skin Temperatures at the Skin-Prosthesis Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
7
47
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of skin temperature increase was 1.5°C following walking in the study by Klute et al [9]. Huff et al claimed that people with amputation might need more than 1 h of rest following activity to return to the basal skin temperature [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The amount of skin temperature increase was 1.5°C following walking in the study by Klute et al [9]. Huff et al claimed that people with amputation might need more than 1 h of rest following activity to return to the basal skin temperature [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A small number of studies were found in the literature investigating thermal skin fluctuations of the residual limb during activity. This difficult investigation requires positioning thermistors in the socket-skin interface, which consequently could give the person with amputation discomfort, skin irritation, and ulceration [10]. Peery et al, in a similar investigation, measured the skin temperature of the residual limb in people with transtibial amputation during two positions of rest and walking [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sixteen thermistors (Type MA100GG; Thermometrics, Edison, NJ, USA), validated before use with a water-bath procedure and a National Institute of Standards and Technology-calibrated instrument [6], were secured with medical-grade tape onto the participant's residual limb in four anatomically defined circumferential locations consisting of four columns of four sensors each (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to application, these sensors were validated in a water bath using a National Institute of Standards and Technology-calibrated instrument (<0.3°C error [9]). To aid sensor placement on the residual limb, lines were drawn that bisected it into proximal and distal locations.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%