2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0240-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring resilience with the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): which version to choose?

Abstract: Study design Cross-sectional psychometric study. Objectives To compare psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) with 25, 10, and 2 items, and to assess the agreement between these versions in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting Standard psychological screening at a Dutch rehabilitation centre during the first 2 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation. Methods Anonymous data from the psychological screening were analysed. CD-RISC outcomes were checked for floor and ceil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
41
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten-items Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) is a simplified version of the psychological resilience scale with good reliability and validity. [ 9 10 ] It asked subjects how they felt about the given item over the past month. The answer range is 0 (“not true at all”), 1 (“rarely true”), 2 (“sometimes true”), 3 (“often true”), and 4 (“true nearly all of the time”), with a total of 40 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten-items Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) is a simplified version of the psychological resilience scale with good reliability and validity. [ 9 10 ] It asked subjects how they felt about the given item over the past month. The answer range is 0 (“not true at all”), 1 (“rarely true”), 2 (“sometimes true”), 3 (“often true”), and 4 (“true nearly all of the time”), with a total of 40 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychometric properties of the CDRS-10, an abbreviated version of the original 25-item version, have been established in different populations, 19 with high internal consistency and convergent validity relative to the 25-item version. 20 We chose the CDRS-10 for the best combination of reliability/validity and feasibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, the threshold score is 29 [59]. It showed a good convergent validity, accounted for high explained variance (81.5%) and overall correlation values on divergent validity were close to zero [60]. Internal consistency of the CD-RISC in this study sample was calculated with Cronbach's Alpha.…”
Section: Part 2: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 89%