2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring school readiness globally: Assessing the construct validity and measurement invariance of the International Development and Early Learning Assessment (IDELA) in Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
46
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wolf et al (2017) found strong support for a four-factor model (including items measuring motor skills but not EF), compared to other alternative factor structures in Ethiopia. Wolf et al (2017) found strong support for a four-factor model (including items measuring motor skills but not EF), compared to other alternative factor structures in Ethiopia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wolf et al (2017) found strong support for a four-factor model (including items measuring motor skills but not EF), compared to other alternative factor structures in Ethiopia. Wolf et al (2017) found strong support for a four-factor model (including items measuring motor skills but not EF), compared to other alternative factor structures in Ethiopia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…All child non-academic and academic skills were measured via direct assessment at each of the three time points using the International Development and Early Learning Assessment (IDELA; Pisani et al, 2018;Wolf, Halpin, Yoshikawa, Pisani, Dowd, & Borisova, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has validated the factor structure of the IDELA in Ethiopia (Wolf et al., ). Each item on the IDELA was scored as correct or incorrect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although scoring in our study was for the most part consistent with the original IDELA developers’ standards, additional flexibility was provided on two of the social‐emotional items to allow children to receive a “correct” score for more than one response deemed by local experts to be relevant within the local context. (For details IDELA scoring, see Pisani et al., ; Wolf et al., ). Children's IDELA scores were used as observed variables representing the percent correct in each domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Pisani et al () for details on the development of the IDELA items. Recent studies have assessed the psychometric properties and factor structure of the IDELA (Wolf et al, ), as well as the measurement invariance of the factors across five countries (Halpin et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%