2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in evidence-based practice: A systematic review on psychometric properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SE‐EBP was measured at both pre and postworkshop timepoints. A systematic review of psychometric properties of EBP self‐efficacy scales included 11 scales and found that the SE‐EBP scale has the highest rated content validity according to the Consensus‐based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist 23,24 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SE‐EBP was measured at both pre and postworkshop timepoints. A systematic review of psychometric properties of EBP self‐efficacy scales included 11 scales and found that the SE‐EBP scale has the highest rated content validity according to the Consensus‐based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist 23,24 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in EBP using the 37-item (subscales: self-efficacy = 29-item, outcome expectancy = 8-item) translated and adapted questionnaire of Chang and Crowe [ 16 , 23 ]. Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy were measured on an 11-points Likert-scale (score 0–10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, I developed my own set of mentoring pillars with the goal of providing students with a strong sense of belonging and self-efficacy. Both sense of belonging and self-efficacy, or the belief in one's abilities, have been shown to improve retention and academic achievement (Lent et al, 1984;Brady et al, 2020;Johnson et al, 2020;Hoegen et al, 2021). These mentoring pillars are as follows:…”
Section: The University Of Texas El Pasomentioning
confidence: 99%