1968
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-196809000-00044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring sensory functions of the hand in peripheral nerve injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Light touch perception was measured in the peripheral nerve supply of the hand using Semmes Weinstein monofilaments (Tactile sensory evaluator, Baseline, Elmsford, NY, USA) [20,32,33]. Filaments ranging from 2.83 to 6.65 (0.07 to 330 g force) were applied until they bent and #6.65 was applied just to bending.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Light touch perception was measured in the peripheral nerve supply of the hand using Semmes Weinstein monofilaments (Tactile sensory evaluator, Baseline, Elmsford, NY, USA) [20,32,33]. Filaments ranging from 2.83 to 6.65 (0.07 to 330 g force) were applied until they bent and #6.65 was applied just to bending.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallest perceivable monofilament was noted. The grading for the monofilaments was as follows: intact (2.83), diminished light touch (3.61), diminished protective sensation (4.31), and loss of protective sensation (4.56 to 6.65) [32,33]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, a two-point discrimination distance for a static stimulus is routinely used as a measure of tactile resolution (VON PRINCE and BUTLER, 1967;WERNER and OMER, 1970;JONES, 1989;JIMENEZ et al, 1993). The classical two-point limen test determines the smallest two-point separation at which the subject feels two points instead of one.…”
Section: Spatial Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They obtained thresholds with the filament markings 3.26 and 3.21 for the right (R) and left (L) palms, respectively, while the results for the thumbs were 3.18 (K) and 3.02 (1.). Other studies have led to the elaboration of an interpretation scale which divides the monofilaments into different categories related to expected levels of function o f the patients (von Prince and. Butler 1967, Werner and Omer 1970, Bell-Krotoski 1990.…”
Section: Touch-pressure Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that a patient with a functional foot, but no touch or thermal discrimination sensation, can inflict severe wounds on himself without his knowledge, hence greatly limiting his capacity to move about safely in his surroundings (Bergtholdt 1979). Furthermore, many patients with severe sensory deficits to a limb tend to neglect it (Werner andOmer 1970, Dannenbaum andDykes 1990). According to Taub (1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%