1989
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.173.1.2781018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging.

Abstract: The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) in magnetic resonance imagining is one of the variables that must be measured when comparing the relative performance of different techniques. Although various investigators and official groups have proposed different methods for measuring S/N, these are generally not practical for use by a physician working in a clinical situation. The authors present a simple method that should serve for estimating S/N in most cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
208
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 325 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
208
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual subject scan times were determined from the start of the first FLASH locator image to the last DWI image. We calculated T2-weighted SNR for every section in every subject and then averaged across spinal levels for each subject by using the method outlined by Kaufman et al 20 This resulted in 1 SNR distribution per subject per level.…”
Section: Mr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual subject scan times were determined from the start of the first FLASH locator image to the last DWI image. We calculated T2-weighted SNR for every section in every subject and then averaged across spinal levels for each subject by using the method outlined by Kaufman et al 20 This resulted in 1 SNR distribution per subject per level.…”
Section: Mr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy is low when E ≈Ê and increases with their dissimilitudes. Note that σ has to be known a priori and can be either retrieved from multiple images [69,38] or a single image as described in [37,70,71]. Combining Eq.…”
Section: Likelihood Function ψmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimation of noise was derived from the standard deviation (SD air ) of circular ROIs placed on the air surrounding the phantom outside regions that exhibited image artifacts (e.g., Gibbs ringing, T2 smearing in the readout/phase encoding directions). The SNR was calculated using the formula: (0.655 ϫ signal)/ SD air (7,8). The mean SNR at each depth was calculated from the SNR at the center and off-center in the three slices (nine observations).…”
Section: Phantom Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%