2019
DOI: 10.1101/560243
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring single cell divisions in human cancers from multi-region sequencing data

Abstract: Cancer is driven by complex evolutionary dynamics involving billions of cells.Increasing effort has been dedicated to sequence single tumour cells, but obtaining robust measurements remains challenging. Here we show that multi-region sequencing of bulk tumour samples contains quantitative information on single--cell divisions that is accessible if combined with evolutionary theory.Using high--throughput data from 16 human cancers, we measured the in vivo per--cell point mutation rate (mean: 1.69×10 !! bp per c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SNV detection and filtering. To obtain SNVs for individual cells of the scRNA-seq data, first a list of SNVs were obtained by running the Mutect2 (Benjamin et al 2019), treating the data set as a pseudo-bulk sample, and retaining only the SNVs that passed all filters.…”
Section: Snvmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SNV detection and filtering. To obtain SNVs for individual cells of the scRNA-seq data, first a list of SNVs were obtained by running the Mutect2 (Benjamin et al 2019), treating the data set as a pseudo-bulk sample, and retaining only the SNVs that passed all filters.…”
Section: Snvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within-organism cancer evolution is increasingly being studied using population genetics approaches, including phylogenetics (Navin et al 2011; Yuan et al 2015; Alves et al 2017; Schwartz et al 2017; Caravagna et al 2018; Singer et al 2018; Alves et al 2019; Caravagna et al 2019; Detering et al 2019; Malikic et al 2019; Werner et al 2019; Kuipers et al 2020), to understand molecular dynamics of cancer cell populatons. These approaches have shown promise to be developed into therapeutic applications in the personalized medicine framework (Gerlinger et al 2012; Abbosh et al 2017; Rao et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a metastatic patient with multiple lesions and circulating tumor cells can have tens of billions of actively dividing malignant cells. With an average cell cycle time of ∼48 h and mutation rate of 1.14 mutations per genome per cell division (Werner et al, 2019), every gene in the cancer cell genome is affected by coding and non-coding genetic mutations multiple independent times in a patient with years of metastatic disease. All enemies are at the gate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, patterns of inter-and intra-patient ecDNA heterogeneity differ compared to chromosomal point mutations [13,14,15]. Methods that quantify somatic evolutionary processes based on chromosomal point mutations, such as phylogenetic trees [16,17,18,19,20,21], ratios of synonymous and non-synonymous mutations (dN/dS) [22,23,24], or site-frequency spectra [25,26,27,10,28,29] are not directly applicable to quantify the evolutionary dynamics of ecDNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%