2015
DOI: 10.1162/pres_a_00214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Spatial Presence: Introducing and Validating the Pictorial Presence SAM

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to develop a pictorial presence scale using selfassessment-manikins (SAM). The instrument assesses presence sub-dimensions (selflocation and possible actions) as well as presence determinants (attention allocation, spatial situation model, higher cognitive involvement, and suspension of disbelief). To qualitatively validate the scale, think-aloud protocols and interviews (n ¼ 12) were conducted. The results reveal that the SAM items are quickly filled out as well as easily, int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A manipulation check was conducted to see whether participants perceived the provided 360-degree content as if they were in the actual place using three items of spatial presence (e.g. I felt as though I was physically present in the store; Weibel et al , 2015). The one-sample test showed that participants experienced spatial presence ( M = 4.79, SD = 1.62) that was significantly higher than the moderate value of 4 on the seven-point Likert scale ( t (239) = 7.52, p < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A manipulation check was conducted to see whether participants perceived the provided 360-degree content as if they were in the actual place using three items of spatial presence (e.g. I felt as though I was physically present in the store; Weibel et al , 2015). The one-sample test showed that participants experienced spatial presence ( M = 4.79, SD = 1.62) that was significantly higher than the moderate value of 4 on the seven-point Likert scale ( t (239) = 7.52, p < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this seems to be quite a common limitation in validation studies of this kind (e.g. Lorish & Maisiak, 1986;Weibel et al, 2015), future research may wish to compare the set-up used in the current study (i.e. administrating the PSIUS and the verbal benchmark scale in the same study) with a set-up in which only the PSIUS is administered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In emotion research, a pictorial scale was developed to measure dimensions of emotion with a manikin (SAM, Self-Assessment Manikin, Bradley & Lang, 1994). The original SAM triggered further developments such as an animated version of it (Sonderegger et al, 2016) or a pictorial instrument to measure spatial presence (Presence SAM, Weibel et al, 2015;Wissmath et al, 2010). In the context of consumer good evaluation, product-related emotions are measured by using pictorial scales such as PREMO (Product Emotion Measurement Tool, Desmet, 2003) and LEMtool (Layered Emotion Measurement Tool, Capota et al, 2007).…”
Section: Measuring Psychological Constructs By Using Pictorial Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Putting this together, spatial presence is the illusion of "being there" [30], thereby enabling to forget the real world. Spatial presence, referred to as "telepresence" in a virtual environment, take place when the users are fully immersed, so that they are able to experience vivid spatial illusions [40,67]. Wirth et al [69] explained the formation of spatial presence experiences by integrating psychological concepts; they argue that spatial presence is formed by two elements: self-location (SPSL) and possible actions (SPPA).…”
Section: Presencementioning
confidence: 99%