Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Research in Information Technology 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2978178.2978186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Stylus and Tablet Performance for Usability in Sketching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concern has been revealed in the related scholarship. Annett, Anderson, Bischof, and Gupta (2014), and Helps and Helps (2016) categorized stylus pen as "active and passive" based on the use in capacitive touchscreens. The prices of active stylus pens are higher than the passive ones (Annett et al, 2014;Tanyag & Atienza, 2015).…”
Section: The Views Of Experts About Mobile Writing Application Beforementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This concern has been revealed in the related scholarship. Annett, Anderson, Bischof, and Gupta (2014), and Helps and Helps (2016) categorized stylus pen as "active and passive" based on the use in capacitive touchscreens. The prices of active stylus pens are higher than the passive ones (Annett et al, 2014;Tanyag & Atienza, 2015).…”
Section: The Views Of Experts About Mobile Writing Application Beforementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the widespread use of stylus pen seems to be limited and constrained in near future due to economic costs. In addition, not all active stylus pen are compatible with all brands/tablet models (Helps & Helps, 2016;Tanyag & Atienza, 2015).…”
Section: The Views Of Experts About Mobile Writing Application Beforementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wang et al [2016] proposed to use electrovibration to replicate the frictional properties of a stylus. The main limitation of active modulation is the significant latency introduced by the mechanical components [Annett et al 2014;Helps and Helps 2016]. Our passive tools avoid this problem and benefit from providing an immediate haptic response to the users.…”
Section: Haptic Feedback Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%