2018
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-2018-47
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Subaqueous Progradation of the Wax Lake Delta with a Model of Flow Direction Divergence

Abstract: Abstract.Remotely sensed flow patterns can reveal the location of the subaqueous distal tip of a distributary channel on a prograding river delta. Morphodynamic feedbacks produce distributary channel tips that become shallower over their final reaches before becoming deeper over the unchannelized foreset. The flow direction field over this morphology tends to diverge 10 and then converge providing a diagnostic signature that can be captured in flow or remote sensing data. Twenty-one measurements from the Wax L… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their method is not as sensitive to tides, floods, and storm surges which can inundate the vegation used as a proxy for land in the classified satellite imagery. Still, negative land growth rates were estimated in their study, but not as rapid as those estimated by Allen et al, 2012. Shaw et al, 2018 tracked the growth of the subaqueous platform by using a method that identifies the location of subaqueous channel tips in satellite imagery between 1974 and 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their method is not as sensitive to tides, floods, and storm surges which can inundate the vegation used as a proxy for land in the classified satellite imagery. Still, negative land growth rates were estimated in their study, but not as rapid as those estimated by Allen et al, 2012. Shaw et al, 2018 tracked the growth of the subaqueous platform by using a method that identifies the location of subaqueous channel tips in satellite imagery between 1974 and 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Finally, the third objective follows from the observation that integrating area change over short timescales (1 to 5 years) can result in growth rates drastically different than integrating over decadal timescales in previous studies of the WLD (Allen et al, 2012;Olliver & Edmonds, 2017;Shaw, Estep, Whaling, Sanks, & Edmonds, 2018). Allen et al, 2012 used time, water discharge, and tide level to determine the growth rate of the subaerially exposed delta from satellite imagery between 1983 and 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, a channel network could outgrow the delta front if sediment discharge was too small relative to channel progradation rates. The contrast between constant channel progradation rates and a gradually declining marsh area creation rate on the WLD (Shaw, Estep, et al, ) is potentially the result of this scenario. On the other hand, the delta front could become clogged with sediment if the sediment discharge was too large compared to the network progradation rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, the WLD has grown to cover ∼50 km 2 of subaerially exposed land and marsh (Olliver & Edmonds, ), with an additional 80 km 2 of significant subaqueous deposits (Shaw et al, ). Decadally averaged progradation rates for primary distributary channels were remarkably consistent at each channel between 1974 and 2016 and were 69–116 m/year for an individual channel tip (Shaw, Estep, et al, ). Progradation of primary distributary channels that are 3 m deep into the delta front of recently deposited sediments that is about 1 m deep is accomplished by erosion along the tips and margins of the subaqueous distributary network (Shaw & Mohrig, ).…”
Section: Field Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation