Measuring Subjective Sleep Quality: A Review

Abstract

Sleep quality is an important clinical construct since it is increasingly common for people to complain about poor sleep quality and its impact on daytime functioning. Moreover, poor sleep quality can be an important symptom of many sleep and medical disorders. However, objective measures of sleep quality, such as polysomnography, are not readily available to most clinicians in their daily routine, and are expensive, time-consuming, and impractical for epidemiological and research studies., Several self-report questionnaires have, however, been developed. The present review aims to address their psychometric properties, construct validity, and factorial structure while presenting, comparing, and discussing the measurement properties of these sleep quality questionnaires. A systematic literature search, from 2008 to 2020, was performed using the electronic databases PubMed and Scopus, with predefined search terms. In total, 49 articles were analyzed from the 5734 articles found. The psychometric properties and factor structure of the following are reported: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Mini-Sleep Questionnaire (MSQ), Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS), Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ), SLEEP-50 Questionnaire, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). As the most frequently used subjective measurement of sleep quality, the PSQI reported good internal reliability and validity; however, different factorial structures were found in a variety of samples, casting doubt on the usefulness of total score in detecting poor and good sleepers. The sleep disorder scales (AIS, ISI, MSQ, JSS, LSEQ and SLEEP-50) reported good psychometric properties; nevertheless, AIS and ISI reported a variety of factorial models whereas LSEQ and SLEEP-50 appeared to be less useful for epidemiological and research settings due to the length of the questionnaires and their scoring. The MSQ and JSS seemed to be inexpensive and easy to administer, complete, and score, but further validation studies are needed. Finally, the ESS had good internal consistency and construct validity, while the main challenges were in its factorial structure, known-group difference and estimation of reliable cut-offs. Overall, the self-report questionnaires assessing sleep quality from different perspectives have good psychometric properties, with high internal consistency and test-retest reliability, as well as convergent/divergent validity with sleep, psychological, and socio-demographic variables. However, a clear definition of the factor model underlying the tools is recommended and reliable cut-off values should be indicated in order for clinicians to discriminate poor and good sleepers.

Associations of loneliness with poor physical health, poor mental health and health risk behaviours among a nationally representative community‐dwelling sample of middle‐aged and older adults in India

“…Insomnia problems were ‘coded as “frequently” for any of the four symptoms as one’ 42 . The ‘JSS‐4 proved excellent reliability and it demonstrated good construct validity’ 43 . Internal consistency of the JSS‐4 was 0.88 in this study.…”

Impact of an Online Sleep and Circadian Education Program on University Students’ Sleep Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours

“…The PSQI is a widely used measure of sleep quality which provides a total score (with a possible total of 21) derived from the evaluation of seven components of sleep (quality, latency, duration, efficiency, disturbance, use of sleep medications, and daytime dysfunction) over the previous month [ 30 ]. The PSQI has high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.76), moderate test–retest reliability (r = 0.64) and is modestly correlated with objective measures of sleep (r = 0.2 to 0.5) [ 31 ]. The total scores were used to categorise students into good sleepers (≤5) and poor sleepers (>5).…”

Which Is More Important for Health: Sleep Quantity or Sleep Quality?

“…We could pay more attention to sleepiness rather than sleep quantity when assessing the executive functioning of pupils. It should also be noted that sleepiness has been regarded as one of the issues that reflect sleep quality [ 62 ].…”