2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10502709.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring sustainable agriculture on a national scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly crucial for food production, which causes varying environmental impacts across food types and regions 10 . Previous global studies have made efforts to assess environmental (as well as economic and social) impacts caused by agriculture through building multi-indicator databases 5,[11][12][13][14][15] (S.I Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is particularly crucial for food production, which causes varying environmental impacts across food types and regions 10 . Previous global studies have made efforts to assess environmental (as well as economic and social) impacts caused by agriculture through building multi-indicator databases 5,[11][12][13][14][15] (S.I Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few are spatially-explicit below the national level 11,13,14 , which is insu cient for evaluating regionally-speci c environmental impacts, such as biodiversity and water stress [16][17][18] . Additionally, many use embedded indicators that are weak and may not be scienti cally evidence-based 19 ; often relate to resourceuse intensities rather than environmental impacts 14 ; measure over different time periods 13 ; relate to agriculture as a whole rather than to speci c foods 11,[13][14][15] ; lack indicators relating to biodiversity loss (particularly eutrophication indicators 12 ) 5 ; or are not entirely spatially-explicit 12 . Multi-indicator databases have often been aggregated into single scores to produce indexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%