2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2015.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring synchronization in coupled simulation and coupled cardiovascular time series: A comparison of different cross entropy measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the location of R-wave peaks, the corresponding pulse feet (start points of PPG pulse) were found by the first-order differential signals [28]. Finally, RR time series were obtained from the adjacent R-wave peaks and pulse transit Entropy 2016, 18, 246 4 of 13 time (PTT) time series were obtained from the R wave peaks to the feet of the corresponding pulse in the same cardiac cycle [2]. The construction approach of RR and PTT time series are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the location of R-wave peaks, the corresponding pulse feet (start points of PPG pulse) were found by the first-order differential signals [28]. Finally, RR time series were obtained from the adjacent R-wave peaks and pulse transit Entropy 2016, 18, 246 4 of 13 time (PTT) time series were obtained from the R wave peaks to the feet of the corresponding pulse in the same cardiac cycle [2]. The construction approach of RR and PTT time series are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulse transit time (PTT) is the interval from the R wave peaks to the feet of the corresponding pulse in the same cardiac cycle [2] and its variability, i.e., pulse transit time variability (PTTV), can also provide insight into the inherent mechanisms of the cardiovascular system. Physiological time series variability has been shown to have the potential to predict cardiovascular diseases [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, whether ApEn or SampEn, the decision rule for vector similarity is based on the Heaviside function and it is very rigid because two vectors are considered as similar vectors only when they are within the tolerance threshold r, whereas the vectors just outside this tolerance are ignored [7,[19][20][21]. This rigid boundary may induce to the abrupt changes of entropy values when the tolerance threshold r changes slightly, and even failure to define the entropy if no vector-matching could be found for very small r [2,7,[19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rigid boundary may induce to the abrupt changes of entropy values when the tolerance threshold r changes slightly, and even failure to define the entropy if no vector-matching could be found for very small r [2,7,[19][20][21][22]. To enhance the statistical stability, we previously proposed a fuzzy measure entropy (FuzzyMEn) method, which used a fuzzy membership function to substitute the Heaviside function to make a gradually varied entropy value when r monotonously changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, coupling phenomena are very common in physiology [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Previous studies have developed a vast number of methods in order to measure coupling [22,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%