2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1773208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Systemic Risk and Financial Linkages in the Thai Banking System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the light of the fi ndings related to the crosssectoral study, the results show that the life insurance sector contributes the most to systemic risk on the US market, while in the European countries, the real economy is clearly more infl uential in case a problem arises in the banking and fi nancial services sectors. Regarding the inter-company study, our results reveal that the major fi nancial institutions do not automatically contribute the most to systemic risk, as has been proven by the study by Roengpitya and Rungcharoenkitkul (2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In the light of the fi ndings related to the crosssectoral study, the results show that the life insurance sector contributes the most to systemic risk on the US market, while in the European countries, the real economy is clearly more infl uential in case a problem arises in the banking and fi nancial services sectors. Regarding the inter-company study, our results reveal that the major fi nancial institutions do not automatically contribute the most to systemic risk, as has been proven by the study by Roengpitya and Rungcharoenkitkul (2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This methodology has been applied in a number of recent studies (e.g. Van Oordt and Zhou, 2010;Roengiptya and Rungcharoenkitkul, 2011). Our study provides two main contributions with respect to these studies.…”
Section: Related Literature and Choice Of Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study builds on the CoVaR methodology proposed by Adrian and Brunnermeier (2009), which allows us to generate time-varying estimates of systemic risk contribution for each bank in our sample. This methodology has been applied in a number of recent studies; see, for instance, Van Oordt and Zhou (2010) and Roengiptya and Rungcharoenkitkul (2011). There are several key differences with respect to our study and that in Adrian and Brunnermeier (2009).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%