2020 59th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cdc42340.2020.9304082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Target Predictability for Optimal Environment Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, [6], [7], [9] consider predictability as system's sensitivity to initial error and have found great applications in meteorology. [12]- [15] either directly use entropy or define entropy-based quantities to measure the predictability of various Markov decision processes (MDP), and then use these entropy-based indexes to give performance analysis on specific prediction tasks. These analyses view the prediction performance from the perspective of information theory rather than from traditional methods, such as root-mean-square-error, patter correlation (PC) and probability, etc.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, [6], [7], [9] consider predictability as system's sensitivity to initial error and have found great applications in meteorology. [12]- [15] either directly use entropy or define entropy-based quantities to measure the predictability of various Markov decision processes (MDP), and then use these entropy-based indexes to give performance analysis on specific prediction tasks. These analyses view the prediction performance from the perspective of information theory rather than from traditional methods, such as root-mean-square-error, patter correlation (PC) and probability, etc.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithm 1: Optimal Control Algorithm with State Unpredictable Input: The initial and target states of the system, x 0 , x o N ; The parameters of the system dynamic, A k , B k ; The parameters of the optimization object, H, Q k , R k , λ 1 , λ 2 , λ 3,k ; The control duration and time steps, T, N ; The upper bound of |u k |, u; Output: The optimal control policy, u 0:N −1 ; Calculate J 1,N , J 2,N and set J 3,N = 0; if without input constraints, u = ∞ then for i = N − 1 to 0 do Calculate P i , G i , M i with ( 12); Calculate W i , Z i and J 1,i , J 2,i , J Calculate µ j and σ j with (11) or (20); Generate a stochastic perturbation δ j from the uniform distribution as ( 16); Obtain the control input u j = µ j + δ j ; Calculate the next state x j+1 with (1); end return The control sequence u 0:N −1 .…”
Section: Dealing With Simple Input-constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, [9] uses extended Kalman filter to estimate the states of a moving object and predict its trajectory by a UAV and [10] presents a multiple model unscented Kalman filter to predict multi-agent trajectory. [11] studies the problem that how to detect an agent's objective…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%