2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring teacher noticing: A scoping review of standardized instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first phase involved estimating the content validity 36 , 37 based on the assessment of expert judges (n=8) in the field of education. 38 , 39 These judges were selected and contacted from a list of teachers who act as supervisors for pre-professional practices in different educational units where students of the Basic Education career collaborate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first phase involved estimating the content validity 36 , 37 based on the assessment of expert judges (n=8) in the field of education. 38 , 39 These judges were selected and contacted from a list of teachers who act as supervisors for pre-professional practices in different educational units where students of the Basic Education career collaborate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, at the end of their teacher education program, pre-service teachers' situation-specific skills will be assessed. Situation-specific skills are predominantly assessed using case materials (Weyers et al, 2023). While most test instruments are video-based, vignettes or paper cases have been used as well.…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Jacobs et al (2011) identified "deciding how to respond based on students' understanding" as the third component of teachers' attention and referred to it as "decision making." Currently, there is a growing body of research on teacher noticing (Weyers et al, 2023a) that focuses mostly on conceptualizations (e.g., Choy & Dindyal, 2021;Kaiser et al, 2017), intervention methods (e.g., Weyers et al, 2023b), and relationships with other constructs (e.g., Depaepe et al, 2020;Kaiser et al, 2015;Krauss et al, 2020), including teacher knowledge and beliefs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%