2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring teachers’ perceptions about differentiated instruction: The DI-Quest instrument and model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
143
1
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
143
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…We searched for a variety of studies that report the use of an instrument for assessing differentiated instruction, via Scopus, ERIC, and Google Scholar, but do not claim to present an exhaustive inventory of such instruments here. In the retrieved studies, we mainly found instruments based on self-report regarding DI practice (Coubergs, Struyven, Vanthournout, & Engels, 2017;Prast, Van de Weijer-Bergsma, Kroesbergen, & Van Luit, 2015;Roy et al, 2013) and instruments for measuring the perceived difficulty of DI strategies (Gaitas & Alves Martins, 2017), teachers' attitudes towards DI (Coubergs et al, 2017), and teacher self-efficacy regarding DI (Prast et al, 2015;Wan, 2016). Furthermore, several lesson observation schemes aimed at assessing whether a teacher applies specific differentiation strategies were reviewed (Tomlinson, Brimijoin, & Narvaez, 2008;Van de Grift et al, 2011;Van Tassel-Baska, Quek, & Feng, 2006).…”
Section: How Differentiation Is Measuredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched for a variety of studies that report the use of an instrument for assessing differentiated instruction, via Scopus, ERIC, and Google Scholar, but do not claim to present an exhaustive inventory of such instruments here. In the retrieved studies, we mainly found instruments based on self-report regarding DI practice (Coubergs, Struyven, Vanthournout, & Engels, 2017;Prast, Van de Weijer-Bergsma, Kroesbergen, & Van Luit, 2015;Roy et al, 2013) and instruments for measuring the perceived difficulty of DI strategies (Gaitas & Alves Martins, 2017), teachers' attitudes towards DI (Coubergs et al, 2017), and teacher self-efficacy regarding DI (Prast et al, 2015;Wan, 2016). Furthermore, several lesson observation schemes aimed at assessing whether a teacher applies specific differentiation strategies were reviewed (Tomlinson, Brimijoin, & Narvaez, 2008;Van de Grift et al, 2011;Van Tassel-Baska, Quek, & Feng, 2006).…”
Section: How Differentiation Is Measuredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An essential feature of the framework is that instructional design is not only related to learning goals such as targeted in the curriculum, but also based upon students' characteristics. Coubergs et al [9] describe this 'ethical compass' as one of the theoretical foundations of teachers' perceptions about differentiated instruction. Another essential element is that teachers invest in ongoing assessment in order to be able to tailor instructional design to students' characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process concerns the "how" of the learning procedure (Ernest, Heckaman, Thompson, Hull, & Carter, 2011), as it is related to the specific activities that teachers design to assist children in achieving the learning goals (Coubergs, Struyven, Vanthournout, & Engels, 2017). Lastly, the product is the result of learning that indicates the level that the goals were achieved (Tomlinson & Imbeau, 2010).…”
Section: Curriculum Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, DI is a complicated teaching approach that involves many strategies and techniques and it is not clear which of them were active during each application in the referred empirical studies (Smit & Humpert, 2012), highlighting the necessity to study the effect of the different aspects of DI (Coubergs et al, 2017). However, the related literature indicates that the strategy of choices, differentiation by interests and flexible grouping are effective strategies on students' performance (Baumgartner, Lipowski, & Rush, 2003;Koeze, 2007;Tieso, (Danzi, Reul, & Smith, 2008).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of DImentioning
confidence: 99%