2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11149-020-09422-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring technical efficiency and shadow price of water pollutants for the leather industry in India: a directional distance function approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that when a merger takes place, it may make sense for one of the merging tanneries to stop producing leather completely. As noted by Singh and Gundimeda (2021), this would be entirely consistent with existing regulatory approaches in Kanpur that sometimes involve shutting down the operations of one or more polluting tanneries. Singh and Gundimeda, (2021, p. 73) go on to point out that environmental regulations in the Indian leather industry are restricted to command and control policies ‘with mandatory uniform pollution control norms across all the tanneries.’ The available evidence (see the case‐study‐based work of Singh and Gundimeda, 2020) shows that the uniformity of these policies combined with high monitoring and enforcement costs have failed to successfully control pollution caused by tanneries in Kanpur.…”
Section: A Mergersupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It should be noted that when a merger takes place, it may make sense for one of the merging tanneries to stop producing leather completely. As noted by Singh and Gundimeda (2021), this would be entirely consistent with existing regulatory approaches in Kanpur that sometimes involve shutting down the operations of one or more polluting tanneries. Singh and Gundimeda, (2021, p. 73) go on to point out that environmental regulations in the Indian leather industry are restricted to command and control policies ‘with mandatory uniform pollution control norms across all the tanneries.’ The available evidence (see the case‐study‐based work of Singh and Gundimeda, 2020) shows that the uniformity of these policies combined with high monitoring and enforcement costs have failed to successfully control pollution caused by tanneries in Kanpur.…”
Section: A Mergersupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It should be noted that when a merger takes place, it may make sense for one of the merging tanneries to stop producing leather completely. As noted by Singh and Gundimeda (2021), this would be entirely consistent with existing regulatory approaches in Kanpur that sometimes involve shutting down the operations of one or more polluting tanneries. 6 Singh and Gundimeda (2021, p. 73) go on to point out that environmental regulations in the Indian leather industry are restricted to command-and-control policies "with mandatory uniform pollution control norms across all the tanneries."…”
Section: A Mergersupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This interesting proposal acknowledges that practical decision making may have to trump pragmatic notions of mass‐scale pollution remediation while funding and support is limited in the basin. Singh and Gundimeda (2021) suggest a technocentric approach for limiting industrial pollution where the best available technologies for improving the local environment are adopted while also considering technical and economic limitations. While Singh and Gundimeda (2021) see the state as having a role in regulating the technological transition of river‐polluting industries, they also advocate a need for market‐based policy instruments in the basin to incentivize change.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh and Gundimeda (2021) suggest a technocentric approach for limiting industrial pollution where the best available technologies for improving the local environment are adopted while also considering technical and economic limitations. While Singh and Gundimeda (2021) see the state as having a role in regulating the technological transition of river‐polluting industries, they also advocate a need for market‐based policy instruments in the basin to incentivize change. In these recommendations there is an acknowledgment that policies are more likely to be successful if they engage and reward polluting industries for gradually implementing pollution control measures instead of prognosticating sudden and drastic policy changes which are costly and lack the political capital to implement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%