2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2019.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring techniques suitable for verification and repairing of industrial components: A comparison among optical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to validate the consistency of the results obtained with the proposed method, they were compared with the measurements obtained with a reference system. Currently, structured light scanning devices appear to be one of the most efficient optical systems to measure parts with complex shapes [40]. In the present work, a fringe projection system ATOS Core 300 SN: 171215 was used.…”
Section: Reference Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to validate the consistency of the results obtained with the proposed method, they were compared with the measurements obtained with a reference system. Currently, structured light scanning devices appear to be one of the most efficient optical systems to measure parts with complex shapes [40]. In the present work, a fringe projection system ATOS Core 300 SN: 171215 was used.…”
Section: Reference Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photogrammetry algorithms typically indicate the problem, such as minimizing the sum of the squares of a set of errors, known as "package fit" [8]. Structure algorithms, from motion (SfM), can find a set of 3D points (P), a rotation (R), and the camera position (t), given a set of images of a static scene with 2D points in correspondence, as shown in Figure 2 [10].…”
Section: Photogrammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology based on complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensors is the most applied. The sensors consist of a semiconductor and sensitive material in the visible spectrum, between 300 and 1000 nm [10]. Chargecoupled device (CCD) sensors are becoming obsolete due to the cost and speed of processing images.…”
Section: Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term close range refers to a range that covers approximately from 0.1 to 200 m, which we will reduce in our system to pieces of 100 to 400 mm, expecting accuracies of 0.5 mm. Our prototype is primarily intended for archaeological, medical and engineering applications, and with slight modifications, accuracies for industrial use can be achieved [ 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%