Measuring the association of objective and perceived neighborhood environment with physical activity in older adults: challenges and implications from a systematic review

Abstract

Background A supportive environment is a key factor in addressing the issue of health among older adults. There is already sufficient evidence that objective and self-reported measures of the neighborhood environment should be taken into account as crucial components of active aging, as they have been shown to influence physical activity; particularly in people aged 60+. Thus, both could inform policies and practices that promote successful aging in place. An increasing number of studies meanwhile consider these exposures in analyzing their impact on physical activity in the elderly. However, there is a wide variety of definitions, measurements and methodological approaches, which complicates the process of obtaining comparable estimates of the effects and pooled results. The aim of this review was to identify and summarize these differences in order to emphasize methodological implications for future reviews and meta analyzes in this field and, thus, to create a sound basis for synthesized evidence. Methods A systematic literature search across eight databases was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles examining the association of objective and perceived measures of the neighborhood environment and objectively measured or self-reported physical activity in adults aged ≥ 60 years. Two authors independently screened the articles according to predefined eligibility criteria, extracted data, and assessed study quality. A qualitative synthesis of the findings is provided. Results Of the 2967 records retrieved, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Five categories of methodological approaches, numerous measurement instruments to assess the neighborhood environment and physical activity, as well as several clusters of definitions of neighborhood, were identified. Conclusions The strength of evidence of the associations of specific categories of environmental attributes with physical activity varies across measurement types of the outcome and exposures as well as the physical activity domain observed and the operationalization of neighborhood. The latter being of great importance for the targeted age group. In the light of this, future reviews should consider these variations and stratify their summaries according to the different approaches, measures and definitions. Further, underlying mechanisms should be explored.

Perceived and objective availability of green and blue spaces and quality of life in people with dementia: results from the IDEAL programme

“…Low agreement between the perceived and objective availability measures confirmed that these two measures captured different aspects of local green and blue spaces and their relevance for people with dementia. While this study focused on people with mild-to-moderate dementia, the results correspond to the large body of previous quantitative research on healthy adults and older people, which has reported inconsistency between perceived and objective environmental measures and different relationships with physical activity and walking [34][35][36], mental health [37] and health-related quality of life [38]. This demonstrates that although people with dementia may have memory problems and difficulties with orientation, variation between perceived and objective environmental measures is likely to be observed in both those with and without dementia.…”

Designing Age-Friendly Communities: Exploring Qualitative Perspectives on Urban Green Spaces and Ageing in Two Indian Megacities

“…m. UGS per capita. The benefits of UGS have been widely documented, however, a majority of the findings are from HICs [ 6 , 20 , 21 ]. This limits the generalizability of the evidence to LMICs and there is minimal research exploring the influence of UGS on ageing in India.…”

Defining Your “Life Territory”: The Meaning of Place and Home for Community Dwellers and Nursing Home Residents—A Qualitative Study in Four European Countries

“…Features of the built environment, such as transport, pathways, access to shops and amenities, were reported in our study to be important to older people, as they largely determine the opportunities to avail of these services. Interactions with the environment are increasingly important for older people as they spend more and more time in their own home, through retirement, or for health reasons [ 15 ]. Agency, or the capacity of older adults to make choices about important aspects of their lives, is strongly impacted by the ability to access and avail of local services and maintain social connections.…”