2017
DOI: 10.1002/slct.201701260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Burning Temperatures of Anhydrite Micrograins in a High-Fired Medieval Gypsum Mortar

Abstract: Typical feature of high‐fired medieval gypsum mortars is a compact microstructure of squat gypsum crystals containing firing products as remains of the calcination process. So far, the burning history of the binder is estimated based on morphological characteristics of the latter. A novel Raman microspectroscopy approach provides access to the calcination temperatures of individual anhydrite grains based on quantifiable spectroscopic changes appearing due to gradual variations of crystallinity, as independentl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this study, except for Figure and Table S1 (Supporting Information), uncorrected Horiba 532‐nm (see Table ) values are presented in order to keep them comparable with the results of previous studies . The measurements can be reproduced with other instruments and measurement parameters by determining the according w IPF (ideally with the emission lines proposed here, if applicable) and recalculating the instrument‐independent values in Table S1 into the band widths expected for that experimental configuration by employing the following slight variation of Equation : wmeasured=1.0692wcorrected2+0.86639wcorrected24+wIPF2. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Within this study, except for Figure and Table S1 (Supporting Information), uncorrected Horiba 532‐nm (see Table ) values are presented in order to keep them comparable with the results of previous studies . The measurements can be reproduced with other instruments and measurement parameters by determining the according w IPF (ideally with the emission lines proposed here, if applicable) and recalculating the instrument‐independent values in Table S1 into the band widths expected for that experimental configuration by employing the following slight variation of Equation : wmeasured=1.0692wcorrected2+0.86639wcorrected24+wIPF2. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The most prominent band of anhydrite II has several advantages as a marker for burning temperature determination compared with the other signals in the spectrum. Not only being the strongest band, which so far was detectable even in spectra with significant contributions from luminescence emission (see Supporting Information of Dariz et al), together with the 1,129‐cm −1 band, it shows the most pronounced shape change at varying temperatures. The less intense signal at 1,129 cm −1 has the disadvantage of being strongly orientation‐dependent, and therefore almost cancelling out at certain orientations of anhydrite crystals with respect to the laser polarisation direction (see Section ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations