Monopoly and Competition and Their Regulation 1954
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-08434-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Degree of Monopoly and Competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such conditions will have a direct effect on how firms organize themselves and their innovation processes. If producers or suppliers strategically pursue the development of firm‐specific characteristics, there is a tendency toward a set of distinctive market distortions akin to monopolistic competition (Chamberlin 1933; Power and Scott 2004). Under this form of competition, although firms may all produce the same class of product (e.g., chairs), individual firms aim to develop a virtual monopoly within the market by emphasizing unique attributes, such as recognizable brands (an Arne Jacobsen chair), stylistic associations (a minimalist chair), or place‐specific associations (a Danish designer chair) (see also Molotch 1996, 2003; Leslie and Reimer 2006).…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such conditions will have a direct effect on how firms organize themselves and their innovation processes. If producers or suppliers strategically pursue the development of firm‐specific characteristics, there is a tendency toward a set of distinctive market distortions akin to monopolistic competition (Chamberlin 1933; Power and Scott 2004). Under this form of competition, although firms may all produce the same class of product (e.g., chairs), individual firms aim to develop a virtual monopoly within the market by emphasizing unique attributes, such as recognizable brands (an Arne Jacobsen chair), stylistic associations (a minimalist chair), or place‐specific associations (a Danish designer chair) (see also Molotch 1996, 2003; Leslie and Reimer 2006).…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the measure treats a situation in which one large firm dominates over three minor outlets identically to one in which four outlets evenly split the audience. Chamberlin (1954) said counting the number of sellers in an area does not measure competition well. Nevertheless, the measure has been used successfully to gauge the impact of newspaper competition on electoral outcomes (Vermeer, 1992) and diversity of public opinion (Lasorsa, 1991), as well as local television news competition impact on content (Busterna, 1980(Busterna, , 1988 and financial expenditures (Lacy, Atwater, Qin, & Powers, 1988).…”
Section: Existing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…If all managers were to have perfect knowledge, perceptions would be the same and would reflect exactly competition as defined by buyers. However, during the middle of the 20th century, economists began to deal with the distinction between the seller's and buyer's perspectives on competition (Chamberlin, 1954;Machlup, 1952).…”
Section: Factors That Affect News Competition Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since brands promise to lend products some level of exclusivity or uniqueness, they are a useful tool for profit‐seekers interested in adapting neo‐Chamberlinan (Chamberlin 1933) strategies: those who wish to differentiate themselves by trying to create virtual monopolies. Adapting such differentiation tactics can have significant long‐term effects.…”
Section: Firms and Brands/brands As An Instituted Processmentioning
confidence: 99%