An elementary experiment in optics consists of a light source and a detector. Yet, if the source generates nonclassical correlations such an experiment is capable of unambiguously demonstrating the quantum nature of light. We realized such an experiment with a defect center in diamond and a superconducting detector. Previous experiments relied on more complex setups, such as the Hanbury Brown and Twiss configuration, where a beam splitter directs light to two photodetectors, creating the false impression that the beam splitter is a fundamentally required element. As an additional benefit, our results provide a simplification of the widely used photon-correlation techniques. Loudon [4] that a much simpler experiment in which the light is arranged to fall on a single phototube would be sufficient. Here, we perform such an experiment and show single-photon statistics from a quantum emitter with only one detector. The superconducting detector we fabricated has a dead time shorter than the coherence time of the emitter. No beam splitter is employed, yet anticorrelations are observed. Our work simplifies a widely used photon-correlation technique [5,6].A single-photon Fock state is a single excitation of a mode k of the electromagnetic field a † k |0 . A more general single-photon state appropriate to describe the final wave packet generated by a single-photon source in an experiment is a superposition of different spatio-temporal modes containing in total one excitation. The probability P (n) of finding exactly n excitations in the modes may distinguish different states of light. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show a schematic representation of a coherent state where P (n) is a Poissonian distribution together with a number (or Fock) state with exactly 1 photon per mode, respectively. In the case of a single-photon state (n = 1) detection of a single excitation projects the measured mode to the vacuum state; i.e., the probability of detecting another photon in the very same mode is zero. Since the temporal mode profile is associated with a characteristic coherence time τ c , coincidence events within the time interval τ c are absent; antibunching is observed. On the contrary, * steudle@physik.hu-berlin.de † http://www.physik.hu-berlin.de/nano for a coherent state the probability of detecting a photon is independent of any previous detection event. Antibunching is thus not only a consequence of photons being indivisible particles but requires a specific quantum statistical distribution of discrete excitations. The latter requirement is overlooked in a simple explanation of antibunching in a HBT experiment [ Fig. 1(c)]. There a photon is regarded as a classical indivisible particle and necessarily has to decide which path to take when impinging on a beam splitter. Such an interpretation is certainly naïve. It even led to paradoxical conclusions, such as in some implementations of Wheeler's delayed choice paradox [7].Today, many different sources have been realized that generate antibunched light such as single-photon sources ...