2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00115-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the economic benefits from R&D: improvements in the MMI model of the United Kingdom National Measurement System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last 10 years, the academic literature has provided evidence of the important role played by research and development (R&D) in economic growth (Jones, 1995; Bowns et al, 2003; Arnold, 2006). As a result, scholars have paid increasing attention to R&D spending, which is no longer considered a cost but rather a value‐increasing investment in that R&D spending yields some supranormal profits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 10 years, the academic literature has provided evidence of the important role played by research and development (R&D) in economic growth (Jones, 1995; Bowns et al, 2003; Arnold, 2006). As a result, scholars have paid increasing attention to R&D spending, which is no longer considered a cost but rather a value‐increasing investment in that R&D spending yields some supranormal profits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmaceutical industry is very important not only in health terms but also in economic terms, so it is relevant to study its internal and external R&D activity at both industry and laboratory level, and from the perspectives of public [9] and private funding of R&D. In addition, pharmaceutical companies have engaged in R&D collaboration not only with other laboratories but also with other firms and universities [45]. According to the IMS Institute [35], spending on medicines will reach nearly 1.3 trillion USD in 2018.…”
Section: Efficiency Measurement In Pharmaceutical Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that low innovators focus on organizational innovation (particularly management processes) to the exclusion of technological innovation. Although some research shows that organizational innovation can be just as critical to a firm's success as technological innovation (Hardie et al 2005), there is evidence to support the widely held view that technological innovation plays the lead role in driving growth (Bowns et al 2003), especially in combination with organizational innovation (ABS 2007). The findings here support Bowns et al (2003) on the value of technological innovation.…”
Section: Technology Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%