2017
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1299799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the effect of an ongoing urbanization process on biodiversity conservation suitability index: integrating scenario-based urban growth modelling with Conservation Assessment and Prioritization System (CAPS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, a polycentric pattern of growth instead of high-density urban development is emphasized and urban vegetation covers under such pattern have a better chance to survive for encroachment of builtstructures. As indicated in previous studies (Sakieh et al 2015;Afrakhteh et al 2016;Sakieh et al 2017), such pattern of urban growth allocation is associated with many ecological benefits such as lower LST values, calmer landscapes and higher land potential for urban construction activities and biodiversity conservation (Goodarzi et al 2017). In addition, Afrakhteh et al (2016) highlights this strategy under the concept of smart rural development in central Iran.…”
Section: 4 Planning Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In other words, a polycentric pattern of growth instead of high-density urban development is emphasized and urban vegetation covers under such pattern have a better chance to survive for encroachment of builtstructures. As indicated in previous studies (Sakieh et al 2015;Afrakhteh et al 2016;Sakieh et al 2017), such pattern of urban growth allocation is associated with many ecological benefits such as lower LST values, calmer landscapes and higher land potential for urban construction activities and biodiversity conservation (Goodarzi et al 2017). In addition, Afrakhteh et al (2016) highlights this strategy under the concept of smart rural development in central Iran.…”
Section: 4 Planning Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A forecast based on fewer observations (mono-temporal, bi-temporal) is possible but is only made in few and special cases. We observed mono-temporal forecasts only in studies, in which projected non-EO data is combined with EO-derived recent or future LULC maps [65,78,134,138,143,[156][157][158]168]. The same occurs in two bi-temporal projection-based studies by Patil et al [175] and Yao et al [177], while others employ transition probabilities or transition vectors between two time steps to forecast future conditions [65,81,83,174].…”
Section: Temporal Scopementioning
confidence: 85%
“…In general, however, next to OLS, machine learning methods are used much less frequently in this forecast model category. Of the 22 projection-based forecasting studies identified in this review, 15 were based on climate projections [78,85,130,131,134,142,[154][155][156][168][169][170]175,177,178], six on LULC projections [65,143,144,157,158,167], and one study on both [118].…”
Section: Categorization Of Forecasting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations