2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the effect of different types of unsupervised word representations on Medical Named Entity Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes different word embeddings (CoRoLa and MARCELL embeddings) and also combinations of the two embeddings. Previous work (Pȃis , and Mitrofan, 2021), (Casillas et al, 2019) has shown that using different word embeddings and combinations can improve NER performance. For each word representation we adapted the main BiLSTM layer size to match the embedding size.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes different word embeddings (CoRoLa and MARCELL embeddings) and also combinations of the two embeddings. Previous work (Pȃis , and Mitrofan, 2021), (Casillas et al, 2019) has shown that using different word embeddings and combinations can improve NER performance. For each word representation we adapted the main BiLSTM layer size to match the embedding size.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Word embedding techniques have been effective in learning low-dimensional vector space representations of an input word and capturing semantic relationships among words. Word embedding has been extended to the representations of sentences and paragraphs [24], relational entities [25,26], descriptive texts of images [27,28], entities [29,30] and so on. It is computationally more efficient than many other competitive techniques [8,31,32] and thus, many IR systems have recently attained enhanced performance with less human engineering using such techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these competitions in recent years, improvements have been made mostly in the entity recognition subtask using neural networks such as Bi-LSTM + CRFs (Lample et al, 2016). (Casillas et al, 2019) used the tool for the detection of entities in clinical texts in Spanish, obtaining improvements with respect to previous works (Perez et al, 2017), from an F1-Score of 70.30 to 72.01. Employing a similar system (Goenaga et al, 2018) obtained the first position at the last IberEval shared task (Hermenegildo Fabregat and Araujo, 2018).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%