2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2010.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the effects of geographical distance on stock market correlation

Abstract: Recent studies suggest that the correlation of stock returns increases with decreasing geographical distance. However, there is some debate on the appropriate methodology for measuring the effects of distance on correlation. We modify a regression approach suggested in the literature and complement it with an approach from spatial statistics, the mark correlation function. For the stocks contained in the S&P 500 that we examine, both approaches lead to similar results: correlation increases with decreasing dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10. Our finding is slightly different from Eckel et al (2011) who use a mark correlation function of residual stock returns and find that in the US the spatial correlation of stock returns disappears after 50 miles. 11.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…10. Our finding is slightly different from Eckel et al (2011) who use a mark correlation function of residual stock returns and find that in the US the spatial correlation of stock returns disappears after 50 miles. 11.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, markets within a short geographic distance tend to display greater co-movement than those farther apart (Bracker, Docking, & Koch, 1999;Pirinsky & Wang, 2006;Chong, Wong, & Zhang, 2011;Eckel, Loffler, Maurer, & Schmidt, 2011). Thirdly, market interdependence increases as economic integration intensifies, such as increased bilateral trade (Bracker, Docking, & Koch, 1999;Johnson & Soenen, 2002;Pretorius, 2002;Tavares, 2009;Walti, 2011;Abbas, Khan, & Shah, 2013).…”
Section: Literature On Financial Market Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their operating performance was measured by return on assets (ROA) [19,20], while their technical efficiency (TE) was measured by the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) model [21,22]. We measured the participants' risk preference in the different capital markets, which we define as risk culture, by calculating the degree of price fluctuation brought by recessive factors [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%