Measuring the efficiency, effectiveness and changeability of institutions for improving national innovation system

Afshari-Mofrad, Masoud; Ghazinoory, Sepehr; Nasri, Shohreh

doi:10.1080/19761597.2020.1797517

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…National innovation systems (Hung 2000 ; Dodgson 2009 ; Hung and Whittington 2011 ; Watkins et al 2015 ; Jiang and Zhang 2020 ; Kang and Jiang 2020 ; Afshari-Mofrad et al 2021 ; Perry 2021 )…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Institutional ownership (Cooke and Saini 2010 ; Yi et al 2017 ; Rong et al 2017 ; Asiedu et al 2020 ; Bennett and Nikolaev 2020 ; Kang and Jiang 2020 ; Li et al 2020 ; Afshari-Mofrad et al 2021 ; Sharma and Sharma 2021 ; Bentzen et al 2021 ; Godlewska 2021 ; Hussen and Çokgezen 2021 )…”

Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although researchers agree on the importance of high performing and pro-innovation institutions, the spotlight on quality and control determinants tend to vary. Measuring efficacy and changeability offers the main interest for some researchers (Bennett and Nikolaev 2020 ; Afshari-Mofrad et al 2021 ), while others analyse factors related to innovation performance (Asiedu et al 2020 ; Bentzen et al 2021 ; Godlewska 2021 ) or the performance of institutional entities such as firms (Li et al 2020 ; Hussen and Çokgezen 2021 ), and universities (Sharma and Sharma 2021 ). The latter interest informs the use of analytical constructs like the quadruple helix, which add a layer of network control for engagement (Schütz et al 2018 ; Kang and Jiang 2020 ).…”

Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2017;Asiedu et al 2020; Bennett and Nikolaev 2020;Kang and Jiang 2020;Afshari-Mofrad et al 2021;Sharma and Sharma 2021;Bentzen et al 2021;Godlewska 2021;Hussen and Çokgezen 2021) …”

unclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

AlMalki

Durugbo

2022

Manag Rev Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Institutional innovation creates smart institutions that idiosyncratically thrive in a world of exponential change. Through policy-driven interventions and experiential learning, managers of institutions become adept at delivering praxis- and crisis-driven innovations required for survival and success. Similarly, the management of institutional innovation remains an interest in research due to links of this form of innovation to economic growth, and the demands of on-going major socioeconomic transformations due to technological advances, increased occurrences of major crises, and emerging socioeconomic challenges. Accordingly, a key question arising from the literature concerns the range of determinants and priorities that influence institutional innovation for delivering society value. Thus, the onus is on scholarship to capture and advance knowledge for harnessing the potency of institutional innovation. The purpose of this article is to analyse the current state of research on institutional innovation. Using the systematic review methodology, we identify and critically appraise 485 peer-reviewed scientific publications between 1969 and 2021. The review finds key determinants and management priorities with a view to developing a multi-level management model of institutional innovation. Guided by insights from the review, the article sets a research agenda for future management studies of institutional innovation.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2017;Asiedu et al 2020; Bennett and Nikolaev 2020;Kang and Jiang 2020;Afshari-Mofrad et al 2021;Sharma and Sharma 2021;Bentzen et al 2021;Godlewska 2021;Hussen and Çokgezen 2021) …”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

AlMalki

Durugbo

2022

Manag Rev Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Иерархическая структура не отражает политические сложности и реальные руководящие функции министерств и ведомств в Иране, поэтому в работах ряда исследователей (Heshmati, Dibaji, 2019;Afshari-Mofrad et al, 2020) и новом докладе Иранского института развития технологий и инноваций 16 предлагается рассматривать НИС Ирана как многоуровневую систему множественного подчинения со сложными неформальными связями.…”

Section: национальная инновационная система иранаunclassified

Untitled

2023

ESC / ЭиСП

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers issues of analysis and forecast of changes in the economy and social spheres in various countries, regions, and local territories.The main purpose of the journal is to provide the scientific community and practitioners with an opportunity to publish socio-economic research findings, review different viewpoints on the topical issues of economic and social development, and participate in the discussion of these issues. The remit of the journal comprises development strategies of the territories, regional and sectoral economy, social development, budget revenues, streamlining expenditures, innovative economy, and economic theory.

show abstract

Reevaluating national innovation systems: An index based on dynamic-network data envelopment analysis

Anouze,

Al Khalifa,

Al-Jayyousi

2024

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measuring the efficiency, effectiveness and changeability of institutions for improving national innovation system

Cited by 5 publications

References 45 publications

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

Untitled

Reevaluating national innovation systems: An index based on dynamic-network data envelopment analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About