Measuring the Impact of Juvenile Justice Interventions: What Works, What Helps and What Matters?

Stout, Brian; Dalby, Heather; Schraner, Ingrid

doi:10.1177/1473225417741226

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recommendations saturate the literature on desistance and crime prevention (e.g. Barry, 2010; Bjørgo, 2016; Pawson, 2006; Sherman et al, 2002; Stout et al, 2017) – varying from macro-oriented measures, through meso- to micro-based measures. In an era where notions such as ‘Nip offending in the bud’ are omnipresent, it is a risk that the main attention will be directed towards individually oriented measures based on the assumption that ‘something is wrong with Peter’.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Youth Justice Reforms in Norway: Professional Support for the Panopticon Society?

Leonardsen¹,

Andrews²

2021

Youth Justice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2014, Norway implemented a reform called ‘Youth supervision’ and ‘Youth sentencing’, inspired by restorative justice principles. This article presents the main content of this reform and considers experiences until today. The discussion looks at some challenges related to the reform: Will reduced imprisonment be the result? Do we see the contours of a panopticon society through this reform? Can young offenders be ‘trapped in help’, without necessary legal protection? Is there a danger of professional invasion, where diagnostic perspectives will dominate? These questions are discussed against international experiences on restorative justice reforms.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Youth Justice Reforms in Norway: Professional Support for the Panopticon Society?

Leonardsen¹,

Andrews²

2021

Youth Justice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Or, malgré l'impressionnante preuve empirique témoignant de l'efficacité du modèle d'intervention fondé sur les trois principes de réhabilitation (risque-besoins-réceptivité) (Drake et al, 2009 ;Kim et al, 2013 ;Lipsey, 2009), il est de plus en plus critiqué au sein de la littérature scientifique (Cortoni et Lafortune, 2009). La principale critique formulée à l'égard de ce modèle est que les interventions visant la réduction de la récidive sont centrées essentiellement sur les déficits et les carences des adolescents (Haines et Case, 2015 ;Stout, Dably et Schraner, 2017) plutôt que sur leurs forces ou leur projet de vie.…”

Section: Les Interventions Fondées Sur Les Principes Du Risque Des Bunclassified

Le désistement du crime des adolescents judiciarisés « multiproblématiques » soumis à une ordonnance différée de placement et de surveillance

Dubé

F.-Dufour

2020

crimino

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En analysant les dossiers de suivi d'adolescents soumis à une ordonnance différée de placement et de surveillance (ODP), cette étude vise à déterminer les interventions qui permettent de soutenir le processus de désistement du crime d'adolescents judiciarisés « multiproblématiques ». Cette étude exploratoire montre que s'ils sont capables d'encadrer les comportements inadéquats, de soutenir la démarche de réhabilitation et de favoriser la (ré)intégration sociocommunautaire, les délégués à la jeunesse peuvent contribuer à l'émergence d'un « projet de vie » qui apparaît indispensable au processus de désistement du crime des adolescents judiciarisés « multiproblématiques » qui, autrement, risquent de s'enliser davantage dans une carrière criminelle sérieuse, violente et chronique. L'analyse se conclut par la présentation de trois recommandations pour améliorer les suivis offerts dans le cadre de l'ordonnance différée de placement et de surveillance. MOTS CLÉS • Désistement assisté, sanctions alternatives, ordonnance différée de placement et de surveillance, délégués à la jeunesse, troubles de santé mentale.

show abstract

“…Trauma-specific treatment can reduce symptomatology, with some interventions helping to reduce recidivism (Cohen et al, 2016). Best-practice treatments specific to treating trauma symptoms with the JJ population include group interventions such as dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress (SPARCS), and Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET; Ford et al, 2016), as well as individual interventions such as cognitive processing therapy (CPT), Trauma-Grief Components Therapy for Adolescents (TGCT-A), TF-CBT, and Seeking Safety (Fasulo, Ball, Jurkovic, & Miller, 2015; Ford et al, 2016; Lenz, Henesy, & Callender, 2016; Quinn & Shera, 2009; Stout, Dalby, & Schraner, 2017).…”

Section: Literature Review Of Psychosocial Interventions For Juvenile...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of trauma-focused cognitive–behavioral therapy in juvenile detention: A practice note from the field.

Snyder¹

2018

Practice Innovations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Juvenile-justice-involved youth are known to have higher rates of traumatic exposure and traumatic stress symptoms, which increases the necessity for appropriate treatment and targeted case planning for these youth. Traumatic stress symptoms have been shown as a risk factor for delinquent behaviors, though practices for treating juvenile-justice-involved youth who have traumatic stress symptoms is limited. Evidence-based practice dissemination has focused on the use of trauma-focused treatment in residential and community settings. Juvenile-justice-involved youth can be most vulnerable in the secure detention setting. Youth in detention face ongoing stressors in the secure setting, having to witness interpersonal violence by peers, being subject to physical restraints, and attempting to cope in a setting with limited choices. Best practices for the juvenile detention setting are even more limited, despite knowledge of the efficacy of evidence-based trauma interventions in reducing trauma symptoms and restoring healthy family dynamics and relationships that trauma disrupts. This practice note discusses the implementation of trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy in the detention setting, and the interventions flexibility, appropriateness, and impact for youth in detention. Clinical Impact StatementLittle is known regarding implementation of evidence-based psychosocial intervention for trauma in youth detention, with more emphasis being placed on assessment and referral for this setting. This practice note demonstrates implementation of trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy and how the model can be adapted for the unique needs of these youth.

show abstract

Measuring the Impact of Juvenile Justice Interventions: What Works, What Helps and What Matters?

Cited by 5 publications

References 29 publications

Youth Justice Reforms in Norway: Professional Support for the Panopticon Society?

Youth Justice Reforms in Norway: Professional Support for the Panopticon Society?

Le désistement du crime des adolescents judiciarisés « multiproblématiques » soumis à une ordonnance différée de placement et de surveillance

Implementation of trauma-focused cognitive–behavioral therapy in juvenile detention: A practice note from the field.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About