Project delivery quality (PDQ) is a potential target of the construction team, which is working on enhancing this quality thru project stages: design and construction. A very important side of this work is study and research to investigate the critical factors affecting PDQ. Some former studies uncovered that the delivery methods: Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB) notably affecting PDQ. A study appraised the mentioned methods among several features, such as: time, communication, drawings …etc. This paper assumes that there are other critical features to be studied as it's believed to complete the appraisal among DB and DBB. The aim of this paper is to get sound results for deciding which of them will contribute in enhancing PDQ. The paper will run unstructured conversations with design and construction players: owners, consultants (design/supervision), and contractors. They were requested to provide their feedbacks regarding (6) chosen features among DB & DBB. Also, they were asked to justify their scores adding more details. Collected data was organized, tabulated, and analyzed, then discussed, and concluded.Being DB in nature, the involvement of the consultants was easier, as they were contracted to the main contractor (the direct participant in the project), and the contractor also has a closer and earlier involvement of the main contractor in the design process with more consideration of build-ability issues [1].DB is not a new method of project delivery; its roots go back to antiquity. P Thomas mentioned that the pyramids were built though DB, as well as Saint Paul's Cathedral in London, but it fell into disuse in the United States about the time of the Civil War, and gave way to the "new" design-bid-build process through the latter years of the 20th century [2]. Also, he said that the DB delivery of buildings makes it less expensive and more certain that owners will get high performance and sustainability from their new buildings and renovation projects.Although the importance of DB operational differences is widely accepted, there is as yet little agreement of their classification. Different rules and terminologies are used and some of the classifications are contradictory [3]. For example, Janssens D.E.L (1991) and Akintoye A. (1994) consider Design and Manage to be a DB variant [4, 5], while Masterman, J.W.E. (1992), in contrast, refer to Design and Manage as a management-oriented procurement system [6]. Quatman G.W. (2001) and Gransberg D.D et al. (2006) include Bridging as a DB variant [7, 8]. In Beard et al. (2001) classification framework however, Bridging is not regarded as DB, because it is more akin to traditional Design Bid Build and the client/owner is again in the position of warranting the completeness of the design to the bridging contractor [9].Also, it's worth mentioning that The Direct DB process is qualifications-based, which involves the selection of a contractor through negotiation, and the selection of the team is primarily based on qualitative criteria such as past performa...