“…Tracheostomy discussions warrant consideration of: survival trajectory and prognostic duration, healthcare dependence, whether airway interventions fosters the family's subjective definition of quality of life for the child, the ways a tracheostomy may impact the child's ability to vocalize or take food by mouth, potential benefits or burdens to the child in the context of the child's additional comorbidities, and expected functional status with life prolongation by tracheostomy support (Bice, Nelson, & Carson, 2015; Wallis, Paton, Beaton, & Jardine, 2011). In the context of the national home health nursing shortage, technology advancement may prohibit a child from residing in the family home as compared to a skilled nursing facility (Weaver, Wichman, et al, 2018). Thus, if a family's primary goal is for the child to be physically home rather than an inpatient or skilled nursing setting, realistic discussion about care location feasibility should thoughtfully be partnered with conversations about tracheostomy placement.…”