2017
DOI: 10.5958/0976-4666.2017.00077.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Knowledge Level of Farmers Regarding Improved Rice Cultivation Practices and Ranking of Associated Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From table 1, it is evident that, in case of the cropbased module, more than half (57.69 %) of the beneficiary farmers had a medium level of knowledge, followed by 26.92 % and 15.38 % had a high level of knowledge and low level of knowledge, respectively. The results are in line with the findings of Biradar et al (2013), Uma and Sridhar (2014) and Gupta et al (2017). In case of the horticulture-based module, slightly less than half (47.06%) of the beneficiary farmers had a medium level of knowledge, followed by 29.41% and 23.53% had a high level of knowledge and a low level of knowledge, respectively.…”
Section: Knowledge Level Of Farmers About Demonstrated Technologysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…From table 1, it is evident that, in case of the cropbased module, more than half (57.69 %) of the beneficiary farmers had a medium level of knowledge, followed by 26.92 % and 15.38 % had a high level of knowledge and low level of knowledge, respectively. The results are in line with the findings of Biradar et al (2013), Uma and Sridhar (2014) and Gupta et al (2017). In case of the horticulture-based module, slightly less than half (47.06%) of the beneficiary farmers had a medium level of knowledge, followed by 29.41% and 23.53% had a high level of knowledge and a low level of knowledge, respectively.…”
Section: Knowledge Level Of Farmers About Demonstrated Technologysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The first is independent pest control, where the degree and intensity of pest and disease control are chosen independently by farmers. This option has negative externalities and a positive control externality, 4,5 such as the limited knowledge of farmers and their inability to adopt new pest control technologies, that could hinder the effective control of pests and diseases, leading to low profits and poor living standards 6 . The second is joint control (a joint venture of farmers and organizations), by which farmers can benefit from integrated pest management (IPM) systems and their early warnings of pest and disease (group members can share necessary information and knowledge).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%