2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

37
1,066
4
96

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 942 publications
(1,203 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
37
1,066
4
96
Order By: Relevance
“…Since work-family enrichment is a two-way process, experiences in one life domain can lead to a better quality of life in another domain, and vice-versa (Carlson, Kacmar, Wayne, & Grzywacz, 2006;Greenhaus & Powell, 2006). For example, studies have shown that enrichment is positively associated to positive impacts (e.g., affective commitment, emotional commitment towards the organization, satisfaction at work, at home and in life in general) and negatively associated to negative outcomes (e.g., negative affect and physical health problems; McNall, Nicklin, & Masuda, 2010).…”
Section: Work-family Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since work-family enrichment is a two-way process, experiences in one life domain can lead to a better quality of life in another domain, and vice-versa (Carlson, Kacmar, Wayne, & Grzywacz, 2006;Greenhaus & Powell, 2006). For example, studies have shown that enrichment is positively associated to positive impacts (e.g., affective commitment, emotional commitment towards the organization, satisfaction at work, at home and in life in general) and negatively associated to negative outcomes (e.g., negative affect and physical health problems; McNall, Nicklin, & Masuda, 2010).…”
Section: Work-family Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies have shown that enrichment is positively associated to positive impacts (e.g., affective commitment, emotional commitment towards the organization, satisfaction at work, at home and in life in general) and negatively associated to negative outcomes (e.g., negative affect and physical health problems; McNall, Nicklin, & Masuda, 2010). According to Carlson et al (2006), each direction in the process (WFE and FWE) has three components. WFE would include development (both on a personal and intellectual level, for example, "My involvement in my work helps me to understand different viewpoints and this helps me be a better family member"), affect (positive emotions experienced within the role, for example, "My involvement in my work puts me in a good mood and this helps me be a better family member") and capital (psychological capital acquired through the role, for example, "My involvement in my work helps me feel personally fulfilled and this helps me be a better family member"), whereas FWE would include development (both on a personal and intellectual level, for example, "My involvement in my family helps me to gain knowledge and this helps me be a better worker"), affect (positive emotions experienced within the role, for example, "My involvement in my family puts me in a good mood and this helps me be a better worker") and efficiency (developed with family management, for example, "My involvement in my family requires me to avoid wasting time at work and this helps me be a better worker").…”
Section: Work-family Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another initiative is to increase employee job involvement since this is linked to work-family facilitation (Aryee et al, 2005). Employees need to experience greater involvement in their jobs, since involvement in family roles benefit from involvement in work roles through development (e.g., skills, knowledge, behaviors), positive affect (e.g., moods, attitude), and capital resources (e.g., security, confidence) (Carlson, Kacmar, Wayne, & Grzywacz, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%