Measuring the Public Acceptance of Urban Congestion-Pricing: A Survey in Melbourne (Australia)

Liu, Zhiyuan; Shiwakoti, Nirajan; Bie, Yiming

doi:10.3846/16484142.2016.1155170

Cited by 11 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 33 publications

(47 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Then, the stakeholders' acceptance of possible scenarios of development is assessed and theoretical research on stakeholders' choice in urban logistics (Stathopoulos et al 2012) is proposed by explicitly addressing the issues of cooperation (and considering there is an individual and a group component) but also by providing practical but generalizable results. Liu et al (2018) address the issue of acceptance of congestion-pricing policies in Melbourne, Australia. Using a survey-based analysis, authors show the acceptance of inhabitants as regards to different congestion pricing policies, in relation to different users' profiles.…”

Section: Contribution Of the Set Of Papers To The Multistakeholder Comentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Urban Transport: State-of-the-Art and Research Opportunities

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transport systems are undergoing a change of paradigm that focuses on resource-sharing and collaboration of multiple and diverse stakeholders. This paper aims to present a state-of-the-art on the main research issues of multi-stakeholder collaboration in urban transport and address the main contributions of the Special Issue on Collaboration and Urban Transport to the field. To that end, it seems necessary to identify and address the complexity of the relations of the stakeholders in the field, beyond the traditional classification of private and public stakeholders. A functional classification of urban stakeholders related to the different land uses is proposed a refer to space users and space organizers, each with several sub-categories. Furthermore, the collaboration among those stakeholders can take different forms and can be developed at different levels: transactional, informational and decisional. Thus, the main research topics regarding multi-stakeholders’ collaboration are defined as: partnerships, resource sharing, resource pooling and Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) systems. A set of papers in this special issue focus on Urban Consolidation Centres (UCCs), partnerships in transport under a general perspective, multi-stakeholder cooperation and its barriers, collaborative decision-making, traffic prediction and urban congestion. In the papers, which deal with the field of multi-stakeholder collaboration in urban transport, there is a predominance on the use of surveys, but also a focus on data-driven techniques. As a result, this special issue contributes not only to the theoretical aspects, but adds value to technical and methodological issues.

show abstract

Section: Contribution Of the Set Of Papers To The Multistakeholder Comentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Urban Transport: State-of-the-Art and Research Opportunities

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the field of urban transport research, willingness-to-pay and acceptance plays a significant role in the study of feasibility of new charges, especially congestion charge and road tolls (e.g. Grisolía et al, 2015;Jászberényi and Munkácsy, 2009;Yusuf et al, 2014), as well as new pricing schemes in public transport Li et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2016). Analysis of intention-to-use is applied to identify persuasion strategies and promotion tools before the introduction of a new or improved product or service, such as information services (Farag and Lyons, 2012), improved quality and integration of public transport (Chowdhury and Ceder, 2016;De Oña et al, 2016;Fujii and Van, 2009;Kuo and Tang, 2013), automated driving (Payre et al, 2014), etc.…”

Section: Previous Knowledge About Intention-to-use and Impactsmentioning

confidence: 99%

User profiles and adoption attributes of innovative bike-sharing systems: the case of BiciMAD (Madrid)

Munkácsy¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bike-sharing nowadays is a must-have element of the urban transport system that is changing mobility patterns in cities worldwide. BiciMAD, introduced in Madrid in June 2014, is an example of the latest generation (demand responsive multimodal systems), a unique technology at the moment of implementation and a new element in the urban mobility of Madrid. Impacts of BiciMAD on individual travel behaviour (mode choice, bicycle use, etc.) and urban mobility patterns (modal shift, number of trips, etc.) have also been examined. Findings indicate that it has contributed to promote active travel and improve cycling culture. It has also increased mobility (total number and distance of trips) and decreased perceived travel time, which may be considered a key impact of bike-sharing.

show abstract

“…For the case of Edinburgh, where the project was approved, a public referendum was conducted in February 2005, after which the public accepted the introduction of congestion pricing in the city [6]. In recent years, many countries and regions studied the political and public acceptability of introducing the congestion pricing policy locally [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influencing Factors in Congestion Pricing Acceptability: A Literature Review

Selmoune

Cheng

Wang

et al. 2020

Journal of Advanced Transportation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Roads congestion pricing has been considered as an effective solution following the successful implementation of such programs by many cities such as Singapore, Stockholm, and London. In multiple cases, congestion pricing projects have not been implemented, and multitudinous industrialized countries’ governments are struggling to find an effective and satisfactory way of introducing congestion pricing schemes that will not be affected by the public’s negative opinion and resistance. The lack of political and public acceptability can, therefore, be blamed for the nonimplementation of many congestion pricing projects in many cities around the world. This paper reviews eight cases where congestion pricing schemes were implemented or rejected, as well as the major influencing factors that enable congestion pricing introduction and acceptability by road users, discusses public and political acceptance of urban road pricing, and provides a valuable guideline for policy and decision-makers.

show abstract

Measuring the Public Acceptance of Urban Congestion-Pricing: A Survey in Melbourne (Australia)

Cited by 11 publications

References 33 publications

Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Urban Transport: State-of-the-Art and Research Opportunities

Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Urban Transport: State-of-the-Art and Research Opportunities

User profiles and adoption attributes of innovative bike-sharing systems: the case of BiciMAD (Madrid)

Influencing Factors in Congestion Pricing Acceptability: A Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About