Measuring the quality of motivational interviewing in primary health care encounters: The development and validation of the motivational interviewing assessment scale (MIAS)

Navarro, Manuel; Torres, Luis Ángel Pérula de; Fontcuberta, J.; Brun, Nieves Barragán; Ortiz, Juan Carlos Arbonies; Rodríguez, Jesús Manuel Novo; Fontán, Julia Bóveda; Álvarez, Remedios Martín; Castillejo, J.A. Prados; Doutreleau, Gabriela Renée Rivas; Peña, Carmen Domingo; Moreno, Jaime Jesús Castro; Romero‐Rodríguez, Esperanza

doi:10.1080/13814788.2016.1177508

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… Fidelity of the motivational interview model. The quality of the motivational interview delivered will be assessed by coding video recordings of an acting patient session with the “motivational interviewing assessment scale” [ 67 ] before and after the training course provided. Fidelity of the planned intervention.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complex multiple risk intervention to promote healthy behaviours in people between 45 to 75 years attended in primary health care (EIRA study): study protocol for a hybrid trial

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundHealth promotion is a key process of current health systems. Primary Health Care (PHC) is the ideal setting for health promotion but multifaceted barriers make its integration difficult in the usual care. The majority of the adult population engages two or more risk behaviours, that is why a multiple intervention might be more effective and efficient. The primary objectives are to evaluate the effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness and an implementation strategy of a complex multiple risk intervention to promote healthy behaviours in people between 45 to 75 years attended in PHC.MethodsThis study is a cluster randomised controlled hybrid type 2 trial with two parallel groups comparing a complex multiple risk behaviour intervention with usual care. It will be carried out in 26 PHC centres in Spain. The study focuses on people between 45 and 75 years who carry out two or more of the following unhealthy behaviours: tobacco use, low adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern or insufficient physical activity level. The intervention is based on the Transtheoretical Model and it will be made by physicians and nurses in the routine care of PHC practices according to the conceptual framework of the “5A’s”. It will have a maximum duration of 12 months and it will be carried out to three different levels (individual, group and community). Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained measured by the tariffs of the EuroQol-5D questionnaire will be estimated. The implementation strategy is based on the “Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research”, a set of discrete implementation strategies and an evaluation framework.DiscussionEIRA study will determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex multiple risk intervention and will provide a better understanding of implementation processes of health promotion interventions in PHC setting. It may contribute to increase knowledge about the individual and structural barriers that affect implementation of these interventions and to quantify the contextual factors that moderate the effectiveness of implementation.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03136211.Retrospectively registered on May 2, 2017.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complex multiple risk intervention to promote healthy behaviours in people between 45 to 75 years attended in primary health care (EIRA study): study protocol for a hybrid trial

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For the evaluation, the experts provided feedback to each participant, using the Motivational Interview Rating Scale (EVEM). 13 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Evaluation of the standardized clinical interview: The EVEM 13 was used to evaluate MI in the communicational health care professional–patient relationship in PC settings. EVEM comprises 14 items with a maximum total score of 56 points.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of a training program for the management of risky alcohol use in primary care professionals based on motivational interviewing

Pérula-Jiménez,

Romero-Rodríguez,

Parras-Rejano

et al. 2024

Atención Primaria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A mobile phone with a tripod and an external memory card are used to make the video recordings. The recordings will be evaluated by two external observers using the Motivational Interviewing Rating Scale (MIAS/EVEM 2.0) ( 37 ). This scale has been previously validated for the application of MI in primary care; applied to several clinical sessions, it discriminates between the sessions in which the method has been used (and establishes to what degree) and the ones in which it has not been used.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Motivational Interviewing and Self-Care in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study Protocol

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundType 1 diabetes is a disease with complex therapeutic recommendations that require day-to-day lifestyle changes. Motivational Interviewing is a communication tool that has proved effective in changing behaviors in people with addictions, obesity and type 2 diabetes. Our objective is to evaluate the effects of a Motivational Interviewing intervention in people with type 1 diabetes.MethodsSixty-six patients with type 1 diabetes and hemoglobin A1c >= 8% have been included and randomly assigned (computer-generated sequence, sealed envelopes, ratio 1:1) either to the intervention or to the control group. In the intervention group, appointments every 4 months with the endocrinologist include Motivational Interviewing; in the control group, the appointments proceed as usual. Patients will be followed for 16 months. The primary outcome will be self-care behaviors, assessed by a validated questionnaire, the Diabetes Self-Care Inventory-Revised Version. Secondary outcomes include: HbA1c, motivation for self-care, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with professional-patient relationship, and fulfillment of patients’ own objectives. The practitioners receive training in Motivational Interviewing in order to help them promote adherence to self-care, encourage patient motivation and improve the doctor-patient relationship. The Motivational Interviewing intervention will be evaluated by two psychologists, blinded to the assigned treatment, through video recordings of the sessions and the administration of a purpose-built questionnaire, the EVEM 2.0 scale.DiscussionThere is evidence that MI can improve self-care in type 2 diabetes. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of MI on self-care and HbA1c in people with type 1 diabetes.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03906786, identifier NCT03906786.

show abstract

Measuring the quality of motivational interviewing in primary health care encounters: The development and validation of the motivational interviewing assessment scale (MIAS)

Cited by 10 publications

References 15 publications

Complex multiple risk intervention to promote healthy behaviours in people between 45 to 75 years attended in primary health care (EIRA study): study protocol for a hybrid trial

Complex multiple risk intervention to promote healthy behaviours in people between 45 to 75 years attended in primary health care (EIRA study): study protocol for a hybrid trial

Effectiveness of a training program for the management of risky alcohol use in primary care professionals based on motivational interviewing

Motivational Interviewing and Self-Care in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study Protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About