2004
DOI: 10.1109/ms.2004.1293070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the ROI of software process improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One study explicitly reported improved overall organizational performance (McGarry and Decker 2002). There are a number of papers that generalize from both case studies in literature and additional case studies, to aggregate overall statistics, such as average return on investment (Gibson et al 2006;Solingen 2004;Goldenson et al 1999;Krasner 2001). However, these papers recognize that case studies in particular suffer from a selection bias, as most case studies tend to be success stories (Gibson et al 2006).…”
Section: Bpm Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study explicitly reported improved overall organizational performance (McGarry and Decker 2002). There are a number of papers that generalize from both case studies in literature and additional case studies, to aggregate overall statistics, such as average return on investment (Gibson et al 2006;Solingen 2004;Goldenson et al 1999;Krasner 2001). However, these papers recognize that case studies in particular suffer from a selection bias, as most case studies tend to be success stories (Gibson et al 2006).…”
Section: Bpm Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research in value-based software engineering has also sought to model various engineering activities. Return On Investment (ROI) models, which calculate the benefit return of a given investment [43], provide one such approach, supporting systematic, software business value analysis [4,38,54].…”
Section: Prior Work On Economic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different groups and their roles/tasks are presented in Figure 3. Moreover, by having a general overview of all the affected processes and stakeholder groups, it is easier to identify the possible costs and benefits [24] which can be achieved by this type oftechnology.…”
Section: Eldm the It Productivity Paradox And The Return On Eidm Inmentioning
confidence: 99%