2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505545112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the signal-to-noise ratio of a neuron

Abstract: SignificanceNeurons represent both signal and noise in binary electrical discharges termed action potentials. Hence, the standard signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) definition of signal amplitude squared and divided by the noise variance does not apply. We show that the SNR estimates a ratio of expected prediction errors. Using point process generalized linear models, we extend the standard definition to one appropriate for single neurons. In analyses of four neural systems, we show that single neuron SNRs range from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, true prediction accuracy (TPA) can be attained only if the true genetic values for the target set are available. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (Czanner et al, 2015 ) for each method, with respect to each target set, was calculated as the sample variance of the predicted genetic values over the sample variance of the estimated residuals associated to the target phenotypes. Note that the SNR is related to genomic based heritabilities (De los Campos et al, 2013b ; Janson et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, true prediction accuracy (TPA) can be attained only if the true genetic values for the target set are available. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (Czanner et al, 2015 ) for each method, with respect to each target set, was calculated as the sample variance of the predicted genetic values over the sample variance of the estimated residuals associated to the target phenotypes. Note that the SNR is related to genomic based heritabilities (De los Campos et al, 2013b ; Janson et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, each set of parameter values comes with its own probability that informs us about how likely this set represents the observed data. In the past, the combination of Bayesian inference and point processes has been successfully applied to action potential spike trains in neurons [ 35 , 36 ], but to our knowledge, this is the first time that Ca 2+ spike sequences have been analysed in this way. While we can draw on these previous results, the substantial differences between action potential spike trains and Ca 2+ spike sequences (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of the STPM is that the history effects are restricted to the last spike only. To evaluate effects evoked beyond the last spike, we considered the GLM ( Truccolo et al, 2005 ; Czanner et al, 2015 ) with conditional intensity of the form where s ( t ) is the driving force and h ( τ ) is the spike history kernel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we propose a mechanism that explains the precise patterns of single-neuron responses as an interplay between synaptic inputs and intrinsic refractory properties of the neuron ( Berry and Meister, 1998 ; Czanner et al, 2015 ). To test this hypothesis, we develop simple models capturing the two processes, and we are able to fit the parameters of the models to extracellular recordings of single-unit activity in the somatosensory cortex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%