2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9733-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Social Recreation Per-Day Net Benefit of the Wildlife Amenities of a National Park: A Count-Data Travel-Cost Approach

Abstract: In this article, we apply count-data travel-cost methods to a truncated sample of visitors to estimate the Peneda-Gerês National Park (PGNP) average consumer surplus (CS) for each day of visit. The measurement of recreation demand is highly specific because it is calculated by number of days of stay per visit. We therefore propose the application of altered truncated count-data models or truncated count-data models on grouped data to estimate a single, on-site individual recreation demand function, with the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Bell and Leeworthy (1990), Burt and Brewer (1971), Hof and King (1992), Kealy and Bishop (1986), and Mendes and Proença (2011), we use the number of days on site as the dependent variable. Such a formulation has the advantage that it represents a homogeneous recreationdemand relationship, in that the dependent variable is a single recreation day rather than trips of different lengths (Mendes and Proença 2011). The use of recreation days as the dependent variable has long been shown to be consistent with utility maximization theory, if one estimates the relationship as a function of net variable costs per day, including the opportunity cost of on-site time (McConnell 1975).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Bell and Leeworthy (1990), Burt and Brewer (1971), Hof and King (1992), Kealy and Bishop (1986), and Mendes and Proença (2011), we use the number of days on site as the dependent variable. Such a formulation has the advantage that it represents a homogeneous recreationdemand relationship, in that the dependent variable is a single recreation day rather than trips of different lengths (Mendes and Proença 2011). The use of recreation days as the dependent variable has long been shown to be consistent with utility maximization theory, if one estimates the relationship as a function of net variable costs per day, including the opportunity cost of on-site time (McConnell 1975).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current paper, we address this issue by using the number of days on site as the dependent variable. This approach has been applied occasionally in the literature (see Bell and Leeworthy 1990;Burt and Brewer 1971;Hof and King 1992;Kealy and Bishop 1986;Mendes and Proença 2011;Mulwa, Kabubo-Mariara, and Nyangena 2018). We argue that it has an advantage, since the number of recreational days at the site offers better information about recreational demand by international tourists than the number of previous trips.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, informal trails (created by visitors) contribute substantially to impact natural resources, due to their lack of professional construction and management (Marion & Leung, 2011). Impacts can increase significantly in 'hot' seasons, especially in national parks located in mountain summits, as is the case of the Peneda-Gerês National Park (Mendes & Proença, 2011). Respecting the carrying capacity of the natural system where recreation takes place is crucial to preserve species and habitats.…”
Section: Trail Management Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unmanaged tourism events are common in the Peneda-Gerês National Park. The park has uneven recreation demand, with peaks in summer, but there is no data regarding the annual visitors to this area (Mendes & Proença, 2011). Thus, this park constitutes a perfect research model to study how our approach can help in dispersing tourists throughout the year and alleviating the negative impacts of mass tourism.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los beneficios económicos de los servicios recreativos en Los Cabos son positivos y medulares en la economía del estado de BCS, nuestro ejercicio dio por resultado un EC por estadía por visitante de USD$ 4,941.22 con un promedio de 8.4 días y un valor de los beneficios económicos agregados por estadía de USD$5,830.64 millones. Estos valores, aunque mayores, son congruentes con los reportados por diversos autores para otros sitios turísticos alrededor del mundo (Riera-Font, 2000;Fleming y Cook;2008, Mendes y Proenca, 2011Chae et al, 2012).…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified