2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.crte.2017.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the surface roughness of geological rock surfaces in SAR data using fractal geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is needed to discriminate geological formations according to their morphology is the surface roughness [25]. In this section, the results of the IEM implementation to simulate the backscattering coefficient (σ • ) using the surface data and a comparison with the SAR measured ones in the radar bands L, C, and X for the surface roughness computation is described (Figure 1a).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Backscattering and Surface Roughness Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…What is needed to discriminate geological formations according to their morphology is the surface roughness [25]. In this section, the results of the IEM implementation to simulate the backscattering coefficient (σ • ) using the surface data and a comparison with the SAR measured ones in the radar bands L, C, and X for the surface roughness computation is described (Figure 1a).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Backscattering and Surface Roughness Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precisely being a point on the diagonal line of each graph indicates that the IEM simulated value on the corresponding pixel is exactly equal to the measured backscattering on that pixel. Therefore, in these graphs, the farness of the diagonal line shows the simulation error [25,37].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Backscattering and Surface Roughness Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the actual land surface roughness computation by the radar data, there are a wide variety of methods are known, both classical physical simulation [14] and popular modern approaches, for example -the use of fractal geometry [15] or neural networks [16].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%