F e r r a t a S t o r t i F o u n d a t i o n Editorials and Perspectives
206haematologica | 2014; 99 (2) response and on treatment recommendations. 7-9 While biochemical or laboratory abnormalities can be recorded objectively, clinical side-effects, for example, are typically recorded and collected by health care professionals (HCPs) who interpret and evaluate reports from the patients themselves. Probably only a few side-effects, like skin rash, alopecia, edema and fluid retention, can really be evaluated directly and, to a certain extent, objectively by the investigators. All available TKIs for first-line therapy, that is imatinib (i.e. 1st-generation TKIs) and dasatinib or nilotinib (i.e. 2nd-generation TKIs), have sideeffects that one should consider when deciding which therapy is best for the individual patient. However, some side-effects can be more frequent with a given TKI. As an example, while fatigue has been reported to be similar amongst the three TKIs, 10 others, such as rash, have been reported to be worse with both 2nd-generation TKIs. 11,12 In any case, in most studies, recording and assessing the type, the intensity and the duration of the side-effects are not planned, apart from formal reference to some internationally recognized scoring systems (e.g. NCI, SWOG). The data obtained with this methodology can be very different, even in company-sponsored, registrative studies.Just to illustrate how challenging it is to draw conclusions with regards to toxicity data, we report (for descriptive purposes only) five studies, [12][13][14][15][16] all in newly diagnosed, chronic phase, CML patients treated with imatinib 400 mg once daily (Table 1). Interestingly, the reported proportion of patients with any grade fatigue and muscle pain ranged from 8% and 34% (ENESTnd) 14 to 50% and 95% (IRIS), 13 respectively. Similarly, marked differences were also reported for all the other major groups of sideeffects (Table 1). The purpose of these studies, that tested imatinib versus other drugs, was to compare the type and Table 1. Percentage of newly diagnosed, chronic phase, CML patients who were reported to complain of the listed side-effects with imatinib.
Side-effects (all grades)Pivotal trials comparing imatinib (400 mg once daily)
© F e r r a t a S t o r t i F o u n d a t i o nseverity of the side-effects, but not the duration, between two different drugs. However, the reported data in the imatinib arm differed so greatly that it was difficult to assess the imatinib-related burden of symptoms, and can raise doubts as to the value of the comparison. Limitations of standard physician-reported toxicity with regards to the documentation of drug safety have been acknowledged 17 and have prompted the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to create a version of the NCI's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) that can be completed by patients themselves, providing direct patient feedback on their experience of their symptoms during treatment.
18In the context of CML treated with long-term TKI the...