2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11029-006-0028-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the tensile and bending properties of nanohoneycomb structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reflected that the bending modulus of the AAO films, with the porosity less than 25%, had almost no difference between both test types. The results greatly resembled the research proposed by Gall et al [ 23 ] and Jeon et al [ 24 ]. Jeon and his coworkers described that there was no significant difference in the bending modulus between two three-point bending configurations of a nano-universal testing machine.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results reflected that the bending modulus of the AAO films, with the porosity less than 25%, had almost no difference between both test types. The results greatly resembled the research proposed by Gall et al [ 23 ] and Jeon et al [ 24 ]. Jeon and his coworkers described that there was no significant difference in the bending modulus between two three-point bending configurations of a nano-universal testing machine.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Regarding bending properties of AAO films, an atomic force microscope (AFM) or a nano-universal testing machine (UTM) were usually used in the bending test. In Jeon’s study [ 24 ], bending tests were carried out on cantilever beams by pressing AFM tips, and the results were compared with three-point bending tests conducted by using the nano-UTM. They found that Young’s modulus was the same, approximately 30 to 40 GPa, in both measurements and the existence of clogged and open layers did not affect the stress distribution in the porous layer or its modulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fabrication process of nanohoneycomb structures is shown in [20]. The nanohoneycomb structure consists of open, porous, and clogged layers, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Nanohoneycomb Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of the clogged and the open layer did not affect the stress distribution in the porous layer, or the modulus. Hence, it can be supposed that only the porous layer undergoes tensile and bending loading, simplifying the stress analysis [20].…”
Section: Nanohoneycomb Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the bending experiments, it is assumed that the tensile and the compressive moduli of the materials are the same. However in anisotropic materials differences between these two moduli may be observed [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%