2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.07684
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring time with stationary quantum clocks

Abstract: Time plays a fundamental role in our ability to make sense of the physical laws in the world around us. The nature of time has puzzled people -from the ancient Greeks to the present day -resulting in a long running debate between philosophers and physicists alike to whether time needs change to exist (the so-called relatival theory), or whether time flows regardless of change (the so-called substantival theory). One way to decide between the two is to attempt to measure the flow of time with a stationary clock… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formulations presented above are consistent and beautiful. However, the question whether the internal time measured by quantum clocks is affirming the philosophical choice of relatival time (that needs changes to exist) or substantival time (that does not need changes to exist) remains an open question [118].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulations presented above are consistent and beautiful. However, the question whether the internal time measured by quantum clocks is affirming the philosophical choice of relatival time (that needs changes to exist) or substantival time (that does not need changes to exist) remains an open question [118].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation presented above are consistent and beautiful. However, the question whether the internal time measured by quantum clocks is affirming the philosophical choice of relatival time (that needs changes to exist) or the substantival time (that does not need changes to exist) remains an open question [93].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%