Measuring Trade-Offs Among Criteria in a Balanced Scorecard Framework: Possible Contributions From the Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Research Field

Abstract

Claimed by the Harvard Business Review as one of the main innovations of recent decades in management systems, the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) has been widely studied and applied in different management contexts. However, despite recent progress and its undeniable merit, the BSC has its own shortcomings. As reported in the literature, it seems generally agreed that the way compensations between criteria within a BSC framework are calculated remains an open issue. Thus, one of the contributions of this study is to augment the theoretical discussion on the potentialities of the multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach to bring simplicity and transparency to the calculation of compensations (i.e. trade-offs) among evaluation criteria within a BSC framework. It seems important to underline that this paper builds on previous work and is not empirical research. However, it aims to extend the discussion to other (new) measurement contexts. We believe that the development and promotion of the integrated use of MCDA tools in BSC applications to measure trade-offs among evaluation criteria in the BSC framework can be a key factor in ensuring more successful implementations and uses of the BSC within firms.

A Fuzzy Knowledge-Based Framework for Risk Assessment of Residential Real Estate Investments

“…As for future research, it is recommended to conduct similar analyses using other methodological approaches, such as MCDA, which offers a vast portfolio of techniques that allow trade-offs between criteria to be calculated (for further discussion and practical examples, see Belton, Stewart 2002;Zavadskas, Turskis 2011;Ferreira 2013;Ferreira et al 2014;Zavadskas et al 2014;Huguenin 2015). Another possibility may be to compare different methods and/or replicate the process followed in this study with a different set of decision-makers in order to receive another type of feedback and determine the robustness of the results.…”

A multiple criteria information system for pedagogical evaluation and professional development of teachers

“…More specifically, cognitive maps have been characterized as a metacognitive negotiating tool that helps decision makers to understand and structure complex problems, thereby increasing the transparency of the evaluation process (Eden, 2004;Eden and Ackermann, 2004). MACBETH, in turn, has proved to be an extremely versatile and effective tool in supporting the calculation of trade-offs among evaluation criteria in a wide range of decision-making contexts (cf Bana e Costa et al, 1999;Belton and Stewart, 2002;Ferreira et al, 2011;Ferreira, 2013;Ferreira et al, 2014a). From these two premises, there seems to be considerable scope to explore the integrated use of these approaches (ie cognitive mapping and MACBETH) to support the pedagogical appraisal and professional development of teachers.…”

Revenue Autonomy of Local Government: Fiscal Decentralization Aspect

“…At the same time the incompatibility of opinions grows which often exceeds allowable limits. The best known one is T. Saaty hierarchy analysis method (Saaty 1980;Ferreira 2013;Aqhdaie et al 2013). In this case the experts compare only two indexes, but not all at once.…”