2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring urban vibrancy of neighborhood performance using social media data in Oslo, Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the physical characteristics of a neighborhood are closely linked to its vibrancy, defined as the extent to which urban form supports the essential functions, biological requirements, and capabilities of its inhabitants (Lynch, 1984). A study conducted in Oslo, Norway, indicated that the location and distribution of commercial, public, and residential areas and the total population are key drivers of neighborhood vibrancy (Lang et al, 2022). Vibrant neighborhoods typically manifest in high-density, central urban areas with a notable concentration of diverse commercial and public buildings along main thoroughfares.…”
Section: Neighborhood Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the physical characteristics of a neighborhood are closely linked to its vibrancy, defined as the extent to which urban form supports the essential functions, biological requirements, and capabilities of its inhabitants (Lynch, 1984). A study conducted in Oslo, Norway, indicated that the location and distribution of commercial, public, and residential areas and the total population are key drivers of neighborhood vibrancy (Lang et al, 2022). Vibrant neighborhoods typically manifest in high-density, central urban areas with a notable concentration of diverse commercial and public buildings along main thoroughfares.…”
Section: Neighborhood Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the exploration of land use functions, scholars in China and abroad have contributed a number of fruitful investigations based on different theoretical perspectives such as Western political economy, urban economics, and sociology, including the recognition of production-living-ecological functions at different spatial scales [26], the spatiotemporal pattern evolution of urban land use structure [27], spatial differentiation in the efficiency of urban land use structures [28], the trends in and regulation of urban construction land [29], and how human-related drivers such as policy and planning contribute to land use evolution in cross-boundary areas [30]. Traditional methods mostly rely on remote sensing images, land use data, and expert surveys or evaluations [31]. However, due to the characteristics of mixed and overlapping functional areas, diverse attributes, and dynamic changes in urban land use, such classification methods have the following shortcomings:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References: Alcamo (2019); Avrampou et al (2019); Booth (2019); Camilleri (2019); Cramer et al (2018); Dawes (2020); Galford et al (2020); Gracia‐de‐Rentería et al (2022); Honegger et al (2021); Huan and Zhu (2023); Kempf and Dutta (2021); Lang et al (2022); Lee (2020); Lyytimäki et al (2020); Meschede and Henkel (2019); Nayak and Jespersen (2022); Nepal and Paija (2019); Puchol‐Salort et al (2021); Royston et al (2020); Schroeder et al (2019); Singh (2022); Stead (2018); Tan et al (2021); Tselios and Tompkins (2019); Weststrate et al (2019); Yao et al (2021); Zhou et al (2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%