2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring versus estimating net radiation and soil heat flux: Impact on Penman–Monteith reference ET estimates in semiarid regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
65
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed here that both the soil heat flux and the canopy heat storage are negligible. This assumption is not critical at the daily time step on homogeneous bare soil and short crops [46,47]. Daily latent heat fluxes were divided by the latent heat of vaporization to obtain evapotranspiration in mm·day −1 (more details can be found in [48]).…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed here that both the soil heat flux and the canopy heat storage are negligible. This assumption is not critical at the daily time step on homogeneous bare soil and short crops [46,47]. Daily latent heat fluxes were divided by the latent heat of vaporization to obtain evapotranspiration in mm·day −1 (more details can be found in [48]).…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies comparing estimation methods of ETo in relation to method of Penman-Monteith parameterized by FAO are performed for different regions in Brazil and worldwide, as a way to evaluate efficiency of indirect methods (VESCOVE & TURCO, 2005;GAVILÁN et al, 2007;REIS et al, 2007;PEREIRA et al, 2009;TAGLIAFERRE et al, 2010;FRANÇA NETO et al, 2011;CAVALCANTE JÚNIOR et al, 2011;ALENCAR et al, 2011;PILAU et al, 2012;BORGES JÚNIOR et al, 2012). The results of conducted research varied extremely, since each region present peculiar climate characteristics and the estimation methods of ETo exhibits problems of precision and accuracy, mainly because of the non-adjustment of model coefficients and sensors accuracy (BARROS et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Penman-Monteith approach was chosen as the standard method to estimate ETo because it demonstrates that calculated values are rather close to measured grass evapotranspiration at a given site and also points out its superiority in relation to other methods (Cai et al, 2007;Gavilan et al, 2007;Xing et al, 2008). Such a method is based on physical processes and, explicitly incorporates physiological and aerodynamic parameters into it.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%