2019
DOI: 10.35188/unu-wider/2019/679-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring wealth inequality in South Africa: An agenda

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The likely reason for this could be that the Apartheid policies afforded Coloured, White and Indian/Asian sub-population groups more socio economic benefits in terms of housing, education and general wellbeing [ 31 ] . The socio-economic inequalities in South Africa are often visible across racial lines due to the historical legacies of legalized racial segregation [ 31 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likely reason for this could be that the Apartheid policies afforded Coloured, White and Indian/Asian sub-population groups more socio economic benefits in terms of housing, education and general wellbeing [ 31 ] . The socio-economic inequalities in South Africa are often visible across racial lines due to the historical legacies of legalized racial segregation [ 31 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Im Jahr 2019 wurden dort 54 % der oberen 10 % aller Einkommen von der ehemals unterdrückten schwarzen Mehrheitsbevölkerung erwirtschaftet (Chatterjee et al. 2021 , S. 33). Das naturnahe Tourismusangebot hat sich aber mit einigen Ausnahmen noch kaum auf die Bedürfnisse der in diesem Bevölkerungsteil enthaltenen Zielgruppen eingestellt.…”
Section: Big 5 Little Choiceunclassified
“…In South Africa, roughly 17% of residents have access to private healthcare through health insurance, while the remaining 83% rely primarily on the public healthcare system [5]. Clients of the private sector have a higher mean income and tend to live in areas with lower population density [6,7]; in addition, people with lower socioeconomic status are likely to be at higher risk of SARS-COV-2 infection [7][8][9][10]. As such, transmission patterns may be expected to differ between clients of private vs public sector healthcare providers, due to the difficulty of adhering to lockdown measures in higher-density areas [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%