Measuring Web application quality with WebQEM

Olsina, Luis; Rossi, Gustavo

doi:10.1109/mmul.2002.1041945

Cited by 183 publications

(110 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These features are the same as the usability features suggested in [6]. Information received from the first part includes features' weights, and their simultaneity between groups.…”

Section: Research Methods and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Feature analysis within a Web engineering context was first used by Olsina and Rossi [6]. They propose a Website quality evaluation method (WebQEM), which uses a feature analysis technique to calculate a score that measures the quality of a Website.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Unlike Olsina and Rossi [6], this research focuses only on a subset of Web quality measurement, that is, Web usability measurement. We conducted two formal experiments to investigate the following:…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Web Usability Measurement: Comparing Logic Scoring Preference to Subjective Assessment

Yip

Mendes

2005

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper investigates one of the existing methods for measuring usability -Logic Scoring Preference (LSP), and discusses the results of two formal experiments carried out to assess the extent to which LSP embodies the subjective perception of users in regards to Web usability. The two experiments used Computer Science students as experimental subjects. Our results suggest that scores obtained via LSP are significantly different from scores obtained via subjective opinion. In addition, we obtained contradictory results when investigating the consistency of LSP scores across subjects.

show abstract

“…These features are the same as the usability features suggested in [6]. Information received from the first part includes features' weights, and their simultaneity between groups.…”

Section: Research Methods and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Web Usability Measurement: Comparing Logic Scoring Preference to Subjective Assessment

Yip

Mendes

2005

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Website quality models comprise the Web Quality Evaluation Method (WEBQEM) [25], Web Quality Model (WQM) [26], and a model designed for web-based applications [27]. These models can be applied to evaluate the overall quality of webbased applications.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blog Quality Assessment Tool (BQAT)

Zain¹,

Ghani²

2015

IJCATR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A blog quality model and guidelines to determine important features of different blog categories have been proposed to determine blog quality and to promote readers' satisfaction. However, no tools have been developed to assist blog readers in the evaluation of their favorite blogs based on their blog satisfaction. This paper discusses each process in the development of the Blog Quality Assessment Tool (BQAT) in detail. The main functions of the BQAT are to calculate the probability of a blog to be of good quality based on blog-reader satisfaction, and to accumulate the results for the assessed blog. Thus, blog-readers can easily assess their favourite blogs and obtain information on the quality of the blogs visited. This study also shows that the more satisfied the blog is, the higher its quality.

show abstract

“…One new dimension which was added to the model was the Vendor/Consultant Quality because the result of empirical evidence revealed that firms tend to associate the role and quality of the providers of their software with its overall success of the organization [24], [25]. ERP-projects are very complex and take a lot of time, that's why competent partners are needed.…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework for Investigating the ERP System Quality from Users Point of View in Indian Industries

Mukti¹,

Tripathi²,

Rawani³

2013

JOEBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-It has been close to 15 years since the word ERP has been used in the Indian market. The Indian ERP market is currently estimated to be worth Rs 40, 0000 million and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 25 percent in the next 3-4 years. Avery high failures rate of ERP, 93% (approx) makes it a very critical issue which needs an immediate attention. Less work has been done to evaluate the quality of ERP in its operative phase in Indian Industries. The authors have proposed a systematic design of quality evaluation method, in order to investigate the quality of ERP in Indian Industries. Four quality factors namely usability, functionality, reliability and efficiency have been considered to evaluate the ERP to measure the quality from the user's point of view. By combining the outcome of each factor, we find out the Global Quality Preference of the ERP in that industry. ISO/IEC 9126 has been used as a base model for this work.

show abstract

Measuring Web application quality with WebQEM

Cited by 183 publications

References 5 publications

Web Usability Measurement: Comparing Logic Scoring Preference to Subjective Assessment

Web Usability Measurement: Comparing Logic Scoring Preference to Subjective Assessment

Blog Quality Assessment Tool (BQAT)

A Framework for Investigating the ERP System Quality from Users Point of View in Indian Industries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About