Measuring well‐being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF‐36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO‐Five well‐being scale

Abstract

The health status questionnaire Short-Form 36 (SF-36) includes subscales measuring both physical health and mental health. Psychometrically, the mental health subscale contains a mixture of mental symptoms and psychological well-being items, among other things, to prevent a ceiling effect when used in general population studies. Three of the mental health well-being items are also included in the WHO-Five well-being scale. In a Danish general population study, the mental health subscale was compared psychometrically with the WHO-Five in order to evaluate the ceiling effect. Tests for unidimensionality were used in the psychometric analyses, and the sensitivity of the scales in differentiating between changes in self-reported health over the past year has been tested. The results of the study on 9,542 respondents showed that, although the WHO-Five and the mental health subscale were found to be unidimensional, the WHO-Five had a significantly lower ceiling effect than the mental health subscale. The analysis identified the three depression symptoms in the mental health subscale as responsible for the ceiling effect. The WHO-Five was also found to be significantly superior to the mental health subscale in terms of its sensitivity in differentiating between those persons whose health had deteriorated over the past year and those whose health had not. In conclusion, the WHO-Five, which measures psychological well-being, reflects aspects other than just the absence of depressive symptoms.

Physical activity in European adolescents and associations with anxiety, depression and well-being

“…These scores are summed and converted to obtain a percentage score ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 represents best possible level of wellbeing. The psychometric properties of the WHO-5 have been confirmed in a large adult sample [28] and it has been confirmed as a valid scale for use in an adolescent sample [29].…”

Rising food security concerns among New Zealand adolescents and association with health and wellbeing

“…Emotional wellbeing was assessed with the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index, a five item scale assessing constructs of positive mood, vitality and general interests (Bech et al 2003). Higher scores indicate greater levels of wellbeing.…”

The distribution of wellbeing in Ireland

“…The WHO-5 is a shortened form of a wider well-being index, designed to overcome one main problem with psychiatric screening indices, namely the tendency to underreport negative symptoms. As the WHO-Five measures vulnerability to morbidity by examining responses to questions about positive functioning, it is argued that social pressures with regard to reporting depressive symptoms are minimised 36 . The WHO-Five is recommended for use as a first-stage screening tool for detection of depressive disorders in primary care.…”

“…One study which compared the WHO-Five and the mental health subscale of the Short-Form 36 in their ability to prevent ceiling effects when applied to the general population found the WHO-Five to be less prone to ceiling effects and to have a better capacity to identify mental health deterioration. 38 The five-item measure assesses subjective positive well-being, where participants are required to rate the presence or absence of each of the items in their lives, e.g. "I have felt cheerful and in good spirits", on a six-point scale (0 to 5), ranging from "at no time"…”