2020
DOI: 10.1111/ilr.12153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring what matters and guiding policy: An evaluation of the Genuine Progress Indicator

Abstract: This article examines the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which seeks to respond to the shortcomings of GDP and the main contemporary challenges to welfare. As a monetary indicator, the GPI is uniquely suited to evaluate the impact of policy proposals and its dashboard-like features are able to track changes in contributing variables. While the GPI is currently not available for use in crosscountry analyses, it will be measurable using a standard methodology once certain data issues have been resolved and a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the GPI is the indicator that measures overall well-being by adjusting for several negative externalities. What is important, as a monetary indicator, the GPI can be useful to evaluate the well-being impact of political actions (including social policy, Berik, 2020).…”
Section: Genuine Progress Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the GPI is the indicator that measures overall well-being by adjusting for several negative externalities. What is important, as a monetary indicator, the GPI can be useful to evaluate the well-being impact of political actions (including social policy, Berik, 2020).…”
Section: Genuine Progress Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GPI has been linked to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda to create a set of indicators aimed at “ a prosperous, high quality of life that is equitably shared and sustainable ”(Costanza et al 2016 ). The need of aggregating multiple components into a single-value indicator leads to some arbitrary inclusion and exclusion of indicators (Berik 2020 ). Therefore, these indicators are inherently imperfect in capturing the complexity of reality, and they should be viewed rather as a guide towards sustainable well-being and not as sustainable well-being itself.…”
Section: Prioritizing Sustainable Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the GPI-just like GDP-is not a perfect measure of the performance of economies or a complete measure of welfare, and is still being refined, it represents a meaningful departure (along with other wellbeing measures) from the growth-only mantra. As pointed out by Berik [10], the GPI "was the first aggregate welfare indicator to incorporate an inequality adjustment that deducts the cost of inequality from personal consumption expenditures" (p. 79). Its inclusive nature is reflected by it being both a measure of economic performance and of social progress.…”
Section: Inclusive Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%