2009
DOI: 10.3390/s90806058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meat Quality Assessment by Electronic Nose (Machine Olfaction Technology)

Abstract: Over the last twenty years, newly developed chemical sensor systems (so called “electronic noses”) have made odor analyses possible. These systems involve various types of electronic chemical gas sensors with partial specificity, as well as suitable statistical methods enabling the recognition of complex odors. As commercial instruments have become available, a substantial increase in research into the application of electronic noses in the evaluation of volatile compounds in food, cosmetic and other items of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
60
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For meats, sensory quality, shelf life spoilage, off-flavor, taints and authenticity are areas where volatile changes make e-nose screening of samples useful [19]. A KAMINA e-nose with a MOS microarray and LDA was used to evaluate pork meat freshness when stored at 4 and 25 °C.…”
Section: E-nosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For meats, sensory quality, shelf life spoilage, off-flavor, taints and authenticity are areas where volatile changes make e-nose screening of samples useful [19]. A KAMINA e-nose with a MOS microarray and LDA was used to evaluate pork meat freshness when stored at 4 and 25 °C.…”
Section: E-nosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If (ζ⋅ω n ) i is the product of ζ and ω n values of the i-th dominant pole at test run r, then the selected function admits the following form: g r (ζ,ω n ) = (ζ⋅ω n ) 1 + (ζ⋅ω n ) 2 + (ζ⋅ω n ) 3 (5) In other words, for each fish sample a vector X u (see subsection II.C) including the values g r (ζ,ω n ), with r=1,…,20 is formed. If the fish 0_1 is considered as freshness benchmark, then its corresponding vector X f , is compared with each one of all other vectors X u (corresponding each time to the fish samples 0_2, 3_1, 3_2, 6_1, 6_2 and 6_3) by means of the KS test (3). As shown in results of Table I, the correct hypothesis is selected at α=0.001 risk level for all fish samples tested.…”
Section: A Results From Testing and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their major disadvantage is, however, their low sensitivity in detecting early post mortem changes [8]. For instance, the tool in [3] distinguishes between "spoiled" and "unspoiled" meat products. For fish products, this would translate into high effectiveness in detecting the degree of spoilage (that is, how close a fish is for being discarded as unacceptable), but low ability in distinguishing between fish of various early freshness stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[6][7][8] These techniques are alternatives to traditional methods and are quick, easy to handle and do not require sample preparation or the use of chemical reagents. The sensors array in an E-nose system usually consists of numerous non-specic sensors and an odor stimulus, which generates a characteristic ngerprint from the sensors array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%